I am told by a pretty reliable source that DOH made a horrific error in their breakthrough data release today and said there were 2718 breakthru hospitalizations when there were actually 2178. We will update the analysis, but you have to ask yourself how the hell you release such important numbers without triple or quadruple proof-reading. Makes you wonder what other numbers have been typos. But I always want to be as accurate as possible in reporting. We will see if DOH explains itself and issues a correction.
DOH Can’t Proofread, Breakthrough Events Updated
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
December 7, 2023
Minnesota’s Gift to the Country and the Republican Party
Fat Timmy gets a new role in which to spread his lies and insane policies.
Commentary
December 6, 2023
The Labor Market Begins to Implode
The latest labor data shows a declining labor market, with more bad news likely on…
Commentary
December 5, 2023
The Most Brilliant and Simple Defense of Freedom You Will See
Please cry for us Argentina, we have no one as brilliant as your new President.
Funny how DOH & CDC typos or data entry errors always overstate the problem, and the corrections always shore up the narrative.
You expect competence from government employees? That’s funny!
“Jan, does this mean I might not get a bonus?”
Things are so bad with vaccine “efficacy” in the UK they are now arguing over which government stats to use to compute it.
“Do you use the stats that make it look barely effective, or the ones that make it look totally ineffective?”
Safe and effective people, safe and effective.
https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/negative-efficacy-or-something-is