An AHRQ comparative effectiveness review generally finds that telehealth consultations produces as good or better outcomes as non-telehealth ones.
A study in Health Affairs finds that “digital” health companies provide little value for the populations that likely need the most help.
First Stop Health, which offers telemedicine services for employers, has raised $6.5 million in new capital.
https://medcitynews.com/2019/01/chicago-based-telemedicine-provider-raises-6-5-million/?utm_campaign=MCN%20Daily%20Top%20Stories&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=68960534&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--7M1ctnKPbUroTzN3hIP52nRFipqiFapA8BmriRPqsHWC4W6jSNB0WRfWpQ3TIaV15tXQ0oVOUd-U19WkwwGF9vBIKtKp1-LFg6P2Z3atTBVzoPFI&_hsmi=68960534&rf=1An article in Health Affairs provides a quick summary of the state of the evidence for telemedicine outcomes.
A meta-analysis finds mixed outcomes from tele-monitoring of health failure patients.
A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association quantifies telemedicine growth at one large health plan.
Health plan company Regence has issued data showing that its members save around $100 per visit when they use telemedicine versus an in-person visit. About $75 of the savings is the cost of the visit and the remainder is travel and wait time cost.
http://news.regence.com/releases/regence-data-measures-real-world-savings-for-telehealth-usersA draft review of research regarding telemedicine concludes that it generally provides as good a quality of care as in-person services and may reduce costs in some instances.
A Rock Health report gives statistics on first half 2017 funding of digital health companies.
A General Accounting Office report focuses on barriers to greater use of telemedicine in federal programs.
A study done by Rand and published in Health Affairs suggests that telehealth availability may not decrease total health spending.
A Health Affairs article explores the utility of mobile health apps, particularly for high-cost populations.