Utilization of care, and consequently health spending, can vary widely across the United States, and even within small geographic areas. A large body of research seeks to understand what accounts for these differences in utilization, even after adjustment for differing patient characteristics. Physician practice patterns or preferences about treatment may be partly responsible. This study examined variation in admission at the individual hospital level. It looked at differences in admission rates among emergency room physicians. The Medicare population was the basis for the study and a very large number of ER visits and admissions were included. The study adjusted for patient health and other factors and still found a roughly 15% variation in likelihood of admission across all physicians. While not identifying why some physicians appear to admit more or less often than others, this level of variation deserves further exploration, especially in regard to ultimate patient outcomes. It could be that some physicians are not admitting patients who may need hospital care, although it is more likely that patients are admitted who probably would be fine with further outpatient and home care. Hospitalizations are very expensive so avoiding unnecessary ones has been a prime cost control tactic. (HA Article)
The Role of the Physician in Utilization Variance
By Kevin RocheMarch 17, 2022Commentary
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
For those who would like to read more on the crisis of fake and bad science, read this excellent report from the National Association of Scholars. just click this post.
June 4, 2023
CVS has finalized its $10.6 billion buyout of Oak Street health, which operates primary care centers for Medicare members. People may think CVS is a drug store company, but it...
May 4, 2023
Option Care, a large home health care provider is acquiring Amedisys, another large player in that market, for $3.6 billion, as consolidation ramps up across health care, likely meaning higher...
May 4, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace
June 6, 2023
High Cost Patients in the US Population
A timely new report on the concentration of spending across the entire US population.
June 5, 2023
Help, I’m Melting, I’m Melting…..Not
Antarctica is gaining ice shelf extent and ice mass, not melting and raising sea levels.
June 5, 2023
High Cost Medical Patients
A glimpse at high-cost enrollees in a commercial health plan is revealing.
Join the discussion 2 Comments
Interesting series on health care costs over the last several days. While I think I have pretty good grasp of most topics ( at least at a general level), I dont pretend to know or have any opinion on what the primary driver of the US health care costs are, nor do I have sufficient knowledge of the subject matter to form an opinion on how to control health care costs and to provide better health care.
That being said, the push for single payer health care or nationalized health care which is coming from the enlightened progressives who have vastly less knowledge of the subject matter than I do.
Oh my, this is bad.
“Efforts to chart and reduce bias in scholarly publishing will ask authors, reviewers and editors to disclose their race or ethnicity.” And gender.
“More than 50 publishers representing over 15,000 journals globally are preparing to ask scientists about their race or ethnicity — as well as their gender —”
Before accepting for publication.