The Medical Group Management Association is a large and long-standing group representing provider group practices. It produces a variety of regular reports, one of which assesses provider perception of regulatory and other administrative burdens. The results of its annual survey on regulatory burden have just been released. (MGMA Report) Respondents included over 400 group practices, 66% with less than 20 doctors and 14% with over 100. 86% say the overall regulatory burden on their practices has increased in the last 12 months. 96% say reducing the regulatory burden would allow them to spend more time with patients and 80% say reducing the burden would allow more investment in technology resources. Although not strictly a regulatory issue except when public programs like Medicare and Medicaid use it, the report also addresses prior authorization. 83% of practices said it was very to extremely burdensome, with most saying they have had to add staff specifically to comply with prior authorization processes. The new Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System also takes some lumps. 81% of respondents participate in the program. 84% said the program has increased the regulatory burden, with 77% saying it is very or extremely burdensome, while doing nothing for patient care quality. 87% said the bonuses paid under the program do not even cover the time and resources needed to collect and report data under the program. In general, government quality and cost improvement programs are viewed very negatively. 77% of respondents said that the feedback they get on the MIPS cost measures doesn’t help them reduce costs and 58% say they are dissatisfied with the measures themselves. 76% say feedback on MIPS quality measures is not actionable in improving quality and 50% say they are dissatisfied with the MIPS quality measures. In ranking the level of burden from various government programs, not one receives under 50% on being moderately, very or extremely burdensome. The least burdensome is actually the fraud and abuse program, followed by HIPAA. So by all means, lets go to Medicare for All and really ramp up the regulatory burden.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
December 13, 2024
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
Minnesota has negative after-inflation personal income growth as the Incompetent Blowhard's policies destroy the state's…
Commentary
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
December 13, 2024
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
Its over, Johnny, its over, but there is still time left to have some fun.
Commentary
Quantum Computing
December 12, 2024
Quantum Computing
Quantum computing is pretty fascinating and getting closer to common use.