Because seriously ill patients account for so much health spending, a variety of programs have been tried to manage their care appropriately and reduce some of that spending. Research published in Health Affairs describes one such study that appears to have worked well. (HA Article) Beneficiaries with what is considered an advanced illness represent 4% of all beneficiaries but 25% of Medicare costs. Medicare is looking at new ways to pay for the care of these patients. One potential model was developed at a large health system in California. The program was largely intended to provide palliative care at home. Patients had to have a high disease burden, but although much of their care was palliative they did not have to be at end of life and could receive curative care. Home health nurses were trained to administer the care model. There were three full-time medical directors for over 2000 patients. While there are standardized care processes, each patient has an intensive, personalized care plan. Patient goals and care preferences are well-documented. The health system analyzed the effect of the program on end-of-life care, hospital use and spending. A comparison group of similar Medicare patients not in the program was created. Hospice use was 35% greater among the intervention group. The intervention group also had 51% fewer deaths in the intensive care unit and overall hospital deaths were 32% lower. The program cost about $400 a month per patient, and after considering this cost, spending was $4800 lower in the last month of life. This was largely achieved by significant hospital cost savings. The program did not appear to reduce spending enough to achieve savings in earlier months. A separate independent evaluation found that the program had substantially fewer hospital days, overall savings, but slightly higher emergency room use. This study validates the importance of intensive care management for seriously ill patients.
Interventions to Manage Seriously Ill Patients
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 30, 2023
Gee, Why Could People Possibly Want to Leave Minnesota
Minnesota has no population growth, due to crazy DFL policies, while Florida and Texas experience…
Commentary
March 30, 2023
Wait, Dems Are Concerned About Fake Voters?
Minnesota's progressive lunatics discover the virtues of voter id.
Commentary
March 29, 2023
Whacked Progressives Embrace Nihilism
Progressives are pro-regressive and have essentially become nihilists--believing in nothing and seeking to destroy civil…