One of the arguments used by the drug industry to justify high prices is the cost of developing a new therapy. That obviously doesn’t explain the ludicrous price increases we see from the industry, but lets just stick to the price of a new drug. A new analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine finds that, while not cheap, pivotal trials don’t appear to cost nearly as much as the drug industry would like us to believe. (JAMA Internal Medicine) These pivotal trials, often referred to as Phase III, are needed to be able to file a New Drug Application with the FDA and secure approval for marketing. These are typically the largest trials for the compounds and assess both safety and efficacy. The study included 59 therapeutic agents approved between 2015 and 2016, for which 138 pivotal clinical trials were conducted. Cost was estimated using a standard industry tool There was a substantial range in cost, over 100 times, with the median being $19 million. Half of the trials had costs between $12 and $19 million. Size of the trial was an obvious factor, as trials had from 15 to 8000 patients. Orphan drug pivotal trials, with the small patient sizes and no control group, cost as little as $5 million. A very large non-inferiority trial with clinical endpoints cost an estimated $345 million. Trials with no control group or no comparator drug group tended to cost almost a third less than trials with those features. Also, trials with longer trial and follow-up periods and with true clinical outcome endpoints had much higher costs. It is important to note that drugs with only incremental effects or improvements tend to require the largest, and therefore most expensive, trials, but do we really need many of these anyway? In general, this analysis makes me very leery of the very large development cost estimates we see for new drugs, and suggests that those with the most clinical improvement probably have the lowest development costs and therefore should have the lowest introductory prices, but don’t count on that.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Tim Walz’ Minnesota Is Family Unfriendly
September 18, 2024
Tim Walz’ Minnesota Is Family Unfriendly
The government's own data shows that Minnesota is one of the whacked radical states that…
Commentary
Longer-term US Debt Is Hitting a Wall
September 18, 2024
Longer-term US Debt Is Hitting a Wall
A relatively small auction of long-term US debt yesterday is another warning sign about the…
Commentary
The Decline of Minnesota
September 17, 2024
The Decline of Minnesota
Median real household income in Minnesota has declined sharply in Minnesota since 2019, while rising…