Primary care, primary care, primary care. That is all anyone seems focused on these days, largely in the belief that better primary care is the magic elixir for the health system’s ills. A UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform and Modernization (that’s a mouthful) report discusses and evaluates various approaches to improving primary care. (UHG Report) Primary care is only about 6% to 8% of national health spending but accounts for 55% of all office visits. The number of primary care physicians in an area appears to be associated with improvements in quality outcomes. As might be expected, rates of primary care doctors per population unit are highest where income and insurance status is greatest and lowest in poorer and rural areas. Among the approaches the report explores for expanding primary care capacity are greater use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, use of multi-disciplinary care teams that can leverage physician skills and greater use of health information technology to create efficiencies in care processes (good luck with that one since there is about zero evidence that HIT helps, in fact seems to create inefficiencies). UnitedHealth gives examples from its own network of success with the medical home and ACO concept, which are two of the hottest versions of primary care reform, but acknowledges that the evidence for success in improving quality or lowering costs is non-uniform at best. Other approaches to expanding and improving primary care include the growth of retail and onsite clinics, telemedicine, home visits, group visits and focusing on high-cost patients. As the report notes, it is unlikely that any one of these will bring about the desired improvement but collectively they may move things in the right direction. The most impressive results are found in some Medicare-focused primary care clinics, where detailed attention to care processes and care models and very active intervention with patients has shown substantial reductions in overall spending, particularly in regard to inpatient use, and improved performance on quality measures. So it is possible to have an impact on primary care, but one question is whether the costs can be justified across the entire population or just for some relatively high-cost sub-segments.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Cano Health apparently cannot, as it declares bankruptcy due to too much debt. Building primary care centers to serve Medicare, Medicaid and commercial populations, which is Cano’s business, was hot...
February 6, 2024
Turquoise health raises a fresh $30 million in capital for its price transparency platform, as the market for funding health care companies isn’t quite dead yet.
January 24, 2024
I am co-f0under of a company that manages cell and gene therapy for health plans. Cell therapy has made a big difference for many cancer patients but like all new...
January 24, 2024
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace