Primary care, primary care, primary care. That is all anyone seems focused on these days, largely in the belief that better primary care is the magic elixir for the health system’s ills. A UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform and Modernization (that’s a mouthful) report discusses and evaluates various approaches to improving primary care. (UHG Report) Primary care is only about 6% to 8% of national health spending but accounts for 55% of all office visits. The number of primary care physicians in an area appears to be associated with improvements in quality outcomes. As might be expected, rates of primary care doctors per population unit are highest where income and insurance status is greatest and lowest in poorer and rural areas. Among the approaches the report explores for expanding primary care capacity are greater use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, use of multi-disciplinary care teams that can leverage physician skills and greater use of health information technology to create efficiencies in care processes (good luck with that one since there is about zero evidence that HIT helps, in fact seems to create inefficiencies). UnitedHealth gives examples from its own network of success with the medical home and ACO concept, which are two of the hottest versions of primary care reform, but acknowledges that the evidence for success in improving quality or lowering costs is non-uniform at best. Other approaches to expanding and improving primary care include the growth of retail and onsite clinics, telemedicine, home visits, group visits and focusing on high-cost patients. As the report notes, it is unlikely that any one of these will bring about the desired improvement but collectively they may move things in the right direction. The most impressive results are found in some Medicare-focused primary care clinics, where detailed attention to care processes and care models and very active intervention with patients has shown substantial reductions in overall spending, particularly in regard to inpatient use, and improved performance on quality measures. So it is possible to have an impact on primary care, but one question is whether the costs can be justified across the entire population or just for some relatively high-cost sub-segments.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 31, 2023
Electric Vehicles Suck
Electric cars are more expensive to buy and operate than gas ones, and worse for…
Commentary
March 31, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 202
Such a depressing world and I am not sure these research summaries are particularly elevating.
Commentary
March 31, 2023
And Then There is This…
Some supposed conservatives just spout conspiratorial nonsense that ensures that we lose, which is one…