One of the first aspects of the health reform law to be implemented was a requirement that parents be allowed to keep children aged 19-25 on their health insurance policies. The rationale was that this group often is in educational and job flux and has high rates of uninsurance. Employers have indicated that this provision has driven up the costs of health insurance. The Health Care Cost Initiative has issued a report looking at cost and utilization trends among this group. (HCCI Report) The provision was effective in 2011 and the number of people with insurance coverage in this group rose by 3.1 million by December 2011. The study period included the years 2007 to 2012 and looked solely at young adults covered by employment-based insurance policies. During this period, per capita spending increased an average of 5.9% for this group and the increase was 5.4% in 2012. These rates of growth were higher than the per capita rates of increase for any other adult age cohort. Spending for males rose faster than health spending for females, but the actual amount of spending on young women remained significantly higher than for young men, likely due to pregnancy and related services. The types of services with the highest rates of growth were emergency room visits, on which spending rose 15.6% in 2011, and mental health and substance abuse treatment, particularly inpatient admissions which nearly tripled over the study period. Per capita spending for the year 2012 was only $2548 for this group, however, indicating what little need there is for medical care among this group. So you could say it is no big deal to require that they continue to have access to coverage under a parent’s policy or you could say that for most of these young adults, having health insurance is largely pointless. There is likely some adverse selection effect, as those young adults with a serious illness or other likelihood of higher medical spending, are most likely to enroll for coverage.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
No Need for More CV-19 Vax Doses
February 5, 2025
No Need for More CV-19 Vax Doses
Studies continue to show essentially no benefit from additional doses of CV-19 vax.
Commentary
OK, Here We Go with New Job Numbers for the New Administration
February 4, 2025
OK, Here We Go with New Job Numbers for the New Administration
Nothing super dramatic in the first JOLTS release of 2025.
Commentary
Does Anyone Really Not Understand Trump at this Point?
February 4, 2025
Does Anyone Really Not Understand Trump at this Point?
What happened over three days in regard to tariffs was totally predictable if you understand…