Since I have written so much about the issue of the utility of PCR testing recently, I thought I would include a particularly useful chart from one of the studies. This chart depicts the number of cycles versus the percent of culture positivity. Culture positivity is the gold standard for determining viability of virus being shed. You can see the rapid dropoff around 30 cycles. From what I have been told, Minnesota for example, may be using a cycle number as high as 38. People could reasonably disagree about trying to pick up every possible infectious case versus being more cautious, given the consequences, for example in regard to closing a school.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
June 6, 2023
High Cost Patients in the US Population
A timely new report on the concentration of spending across the entire US population.
Commentary
June 5, 2023
Help, I’m Melting, I’m Melting…..Not
Antarctica is gaining ice shelf extent and ice mass, not melting and raising sea levels.
Commentary
June 5, 2023
High Cost Medical Patients
A glimpse at high-cost enrollees in a commercial health plan is revealing.
Maybe you already saw this. If not, I believe you will really appreciate it. By Ivor Cummins: Viral Issue Crucial Update Sept 8th: the Science, Logic and Data Explained! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UvFhIFzaac&t=1254s
Can you please link the article this chart came from?
sorry Matthew I thought the chart you were referring to is the one I just published. The earlier one is from the article I posted on, the Eurosurveillance journal article, and there is a link in that post. Just reposted the link to the meta-review, which I believe has links to most of the relevant studies.