Consolidation among providers of any good or service, whether vertical or horizontal, is likely to lead to higher prices at some point. We obviously reached that point in health care some time ago and a study carried in JAMA Internal Medicine seems to validate that notion. (JAMA Int. Med. Article) The authors measured the degree of financial integration between physicians and hospitals (i.e., hospital employment of doctors or ownership of physician practices) and any association between the level of that integration and the prices paid by commercial health insurers. Changes in hospital control of physicians and prices paid by health plans were measured over the period 2008 through 2012. I know it will shock you, but greater levels of ownership or employment appear to result in higher unit prices. Hospital acquisition of physicians has increased rapidly in recent years, supposedly justified by resulting better care coordination for patients, more efficient delivery of care and administrative efficiencies. There is little evidence to support the occurrence of those benefits, but hospitals sure seem to making it work to their financial benefit. Medicare and Medicaid can set prices by fiat, subject to provider political power, but commercial insurers have to bargain with providers. The researchers constructed measures of market concentration for MSAs for both providers and health plans, and further identified the level of hospital ownership of physician practices. They then looked at outpatient spending for several million commercial plan enrollees over the study period; with spending decomposed into utilization and unit price. Across the 240 MSAs included in the research analysis, financial integration increased by 3.3% from 2008 to 2012, although there was a wide range among individual MSAs. In the MSAs with greater change in financial integration, outpatient utilization was essentially unchanged, but prices rose by 3.1%, or $75 per member per year, beyond what would otherwise be expected. Note that the lack of change in utilization suggests no integration benefit from greater care coordination, etc. Interestingly, there was no apparent change in inpatient utilization or prices. So let’s say there are 150 million Americans getting commercial insurance, that would be $11 billion in excess spending. This research just provides a further rationale for regulators and policymakers to stop this continued consolidation in the health care provider sector.
Hospital Buying of Physician Practices Raises Unit Prices
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
November 28, 2023
There’s a Hole in Uncle Sam’s Arm Where All the Money Goes
A graphic look at the revenue collected by the federal government and how much more…
Commentary
November 28, 2023
Another Survey of Employer Health Plans
More evidence of cost pressures on employer health plans.
Commentary
November 27, 2023
Reading in Minnesota
New laws in Minnesota to address reading declines in schools don't address the real problems.