It is fairly undisputed that both health insurance and provider (especially hospital) markets have become more concentrated. The impact of this concentration on provider prices and on insurance premiums is heavily debated and probably highly interactive, with a four-way matrix of relative hospital and insurer concentration leading to different outcomes in pricing. Research published in the Journal of Health Economics attempts to untangle these effects. (Health Econ. Article) The researchers looked at employer-sponsored insurance and used a Kaiser foundation database to secure premium information over the years 2006 to 2011. They also constructed HHI measures of market concentration for the health insurance and hospital markets using standard databases on insurers and hospitals. Only fully-insured plans were used to measure premiums, but a plan’s share of both insured and self-funded business was used to determine relative bargaining power with providers. Looking at the HHI for health plans and hospitals, there was heterogeneity in markets. Some markets had insurers with more concentration, and presumably more bargaining leverage, than hospitals; some markets with hospital systems with more concentration and bargaining leverage, and some with relatively equal power. In regard to fully-insured employer coverage, almost 100% of the geographic markets are either moderately or heavily concentrated (keep that in mind in light of the latest proposed large health plan consolidations). In regard to bargaining with hospitals, there are a significant number of markets, about 27%, that are unconcentrated from a health plan perspective. As we would expect, greater health plan concentration is associated both with higher premiums for fully-insured plans and lower prices paid to hospitals. (It is a separate question whether consumers see the benefits of those lower prices. The higher premiums would suggest they don’t, but MLR requirements may ameliorate some of that effect.) Markets which have greater levels of hospital concentration have higher premiums as well. The bottom line is that the best situation for buyers of health coverage appears to be to have both a competitive plan and a competitive hospital market; that likely results in the lowest premiums. Unfortunately, what we have in many, if not most, markets is an oligopoly of both plans and hospitals and in those markets the parties likely quickly realize that the best outcome is for the hospitals to get paid more and the plans just pass that on to their customers in the form of marked-up, higher premiums.
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Subscribe to Blog via Email
As is usually the case in health care, the big just keep getting bigger. UnitedHealth Group’s Optum division is buying NaviHealth, which helps manage post-acute care for Medicare Advantage members.
May 20, 2020
Stellar Health shines as it raises $10 million in new financing for its business of aiding providers and payers in doing value-based care.
May 14, 2020
Another typical post. For new readers, this blog usually is all health care business, policy, and research and one staple is me making fun of the ridiculous names people put...
May 7, 2020
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019