The US undoubtedly spends a higher percent of its GDP on health care than other developed nations do. But we are a more free-market economy than most of those countries so this spending to a large extent reflects consumer, voter and citizen choices. Whether we get value for the extra spending is another question, and by many measures we may not. In one disease class, however, it looks like the high spending may be beneficial. A study in Health Affairs studies the relationship between a country’s spending on cancer care and mortality outcomes. (HA Article) Two mortality measures were used, one for “amenable” mortality, i.e., that that could be avoided by timely treatment, and one for excess mortality, or mortality corrected for non-cancer causes of death. Sixteen developed countries were studied, basically the US, Japan and most European nations. The researchers looked both at the absolute level of cancer spending and the rate of increase between 1995 and 2007. Countries were basically divided into low, medium and high cancer care spending buckets. All groupings showed some decline in amenable cancer mortality over the study period, but high spending nations had the lowest mortality, followed closely by medium spending ones, with low spenders lagging. For example, in 2007 there were around 48 deaths per 100,000 population from amenable cancer mortality in high spending countries, compared to 61 in low spending ones. Excess mortality measures showed even stronger separation, from 167 per 100,000 in the high spending group to 192 in the low spending set. Furthermore, the countries with the highest rate of cancer treatment spending growth showed the most rapid decline in both amenable and excess cancer mortality. While interpreting and understanding the implications of the study is complex, the research supports the notion that at least in some cases, more spending can lead to better outcomes. Regardless of cost, a patient with cancer would likely rather be alive than dead.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
December 2024 JOLTS Report
December 4, 2024
December 2024 JOLTS Report
When job numbers bounce around this much, it makes you wonder.
Commentary
Inflation Isn’t Going Away
December 3, 2024
Inflation Isn’t Going Away
Health care and health insurance prices are rising rapidly, contributing to ongoing inflation.