For several years Blue Cross of Massachusetts has offered what it calls an Alternative Quality Contract to provider groups. An ongoing evaluation, which now covers the period through 2012, was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. (NEJM Article) The AQC program encourages accountable care organization like groups and pays them on a semi-shared risk basis. A budget is set for health spending and any savings from spending below the budget are shared and the cost of health services above the budget is also shared. The physician groups can also earn bonuses if they meet certain quality measures. By 2012 , 85% of physician’s in the health plan’s network had entered into an AQC arrangement. Earlier evaluations had found some reductions in spending, but they were smaller than the performance incentive payments, meaning there was no apparent overall reduction in spending. This analysis looked at performance for subgroups of providers who first entered into the AQC in 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012, and compared spending and quality performance to that for providers in employer-sponsored health plans in eight other northeastern states. For the 2009 cohort of providers, there was an average annual saving of around $250 per enrollee compared to spending in the control group, on an adjusted basis. The savings were concentrated in less use of imaging, lab tests and outpatient facility charges. About 40% of savings appeared to be due to drops in utilization, with the rest accounted for by lower prices. The 2010, 2011 and 2012 cohorts showed savings as well, in the same general range as the 2009 group, and again, most of the decrease in spending was attributable to use of lower priced services. When incentive payments are taken into account, by 2012, there was a small net savings. It should be noted, however, that it is unclear that this accounts for all the costs providers incur to participate, but from a payer perspective, total health care spending appears lower. Similarly, there was a consistent, but small improvement in performance on quality measures, both within the participating providers and compared to the control groups. While the results are encouraging, they also don’t represent any real breakthrough in dramatically reducing health spending. As provider groups become more consolidated and pent-up demand for higher income increases, we will see if market power is used to demand higher “budgets”.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Karl Marx
February 10, 2025
Karl Marx
Karl Marx was essentially an idiot whose ideas have been adopted by totalitarians to justify…
Commentary
Debunking Climate Hysteria, February 9, 2025
February 9, 2025
Debunking Climate Hysteria, February 9, 2025
The latest in our irregular efforts to spread climate truth.
Commentary
Bob Dylan, Part 1
February 9, 2025
Bob Dylan, Part 1
A recent movie on Bob Dylan is worth a watch, but his songs are what…