For a number of years hospitals have engaged in mergers and acquisitions with and of other hospitals, leading to an increase in concentration of supply in many markets, an increase which has been linked to higher hospital inpatient prices and more growth in overall health spending. A study in Health Affairs finds that when hospitals buy physician practices, there is a similar effect. (Health Affairs Article) Hospitals have increasingly purchased physician practices in recent years. The justification is a supposed improvement in the ability to coordinate care and greater efficiency. The researchers used a commercial claims data base to identify pricing effects from the period 2001 to 2007 and used AHA and Medicare data to examine hospitals’ ownership of practices. The researchers looked at both actual ownership as a method of vertical integration and contractual methods of creating integration. Only the ownership form was found to have significant pricing effects. In 2001, fully-integrated hospitals had a 23% market share, but by 2007 it was 36%, and it has undoubtedly climbed greatly since 2007. Fully-integrated organizations resulted in prices that were 3.2% higher for each one standard deviation increase in the market share of these organizations. This is not a trivial effect, particularly when combined with increases in hospital concentration in a market. And while the effect was smaller, these organizations also were associated with higher overall spending. These fully integrated hospital/physician practice systems had a slight decrease in admissions, which might be related to the higher prices. Since the looser, contractual forms of integration did not appear to have pernicious effects on pricing and spending, hospitals and doctors could be permitted to engage in these practices while outright ownership of physician practices could be banned. Care coordination could also be accomplished just as well without ownership. It has been common knowledge for years that hospitals employ doctors and buy physician groups because they believe it will increase market share and allow them to raise prices. It is time to not only ban further purchases but to force divestiture and separation of these parts of the health system.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
What do you get when you combine a company with a commodity business model, that out of desperation massively overpays for another company that has a commodity business model? $10...
July 27, 2022
The “stupid” model for health care venture capital investing is alive and well. Everside health, which operates primary care clinics and has grown by acquiring other failing health care businesses,...
July 26, 2022
Apparently not even a cute name can save you if you have a stupid business. I constantly bemoan the mis-application of capital and health care is Exhibit A. Olive, another...
July 26, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace