It has been a while since we looked at Massachusetts’ experience with health care reform, but a new report from the state gives us an opportunity to do so. (Mass. Mkt. Report) The report contains a great deal of useful information, but the very concentrated structure of the Massachusetts payer and provider markets may not make the lessons applicable to all states. Most of the analysis relates to commercial insurance, which covers about 62% of residents, a total which has declined since the state reform. About half the commercial market is self-insured employers. Blue Cross has 45% of the commercial market and the three largest payers have 80%. Don’t expect much competition. The average monthly premium was $421 in 2011, up 9.7% since 2009, almost double the rate of inflation. That is $5000 a year, but all that money is buying less value, the benefits have declined 5.1% in the same period, largely due to higher deductibles and copays, so really the cost of insurance has gone up at triple the rate of inflation. And wow, here is a shock, the three largest insurers had the highest premiums. So much for benefits of scale or leverage. But things are just as bad on the provider side, with a few large systems accounting for a large percent of all health care, inpatient and outpatient. And here is another shock, the largest systems charge the highest prices. Maybe there is some leverage from size on the provider side! Fee-for-service payment is most common, but there has been good growth in global or capitated-type payments or budgets. But there is a little good news–quality is above national averages for both payers and providers.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Mental Health by Political Preference
September 13, 2024
Mental Health by Political Preference
Especially for young women, buying into whacko leftist ideologies is a recipe for having mental…
Commentary
Interest on the US Debt
September 13, 2024
Interest on the US Debt
The federal debt interest payments are taking over the federal budget and will cause immense…
Commentary
Deaths in the United Kingdom
September 12, 2024
Deaths in the United Kingdom
Identifying what happened with mortality and death rates before and after the epidemic is complex,…