In health care, there is hype and there is reality. Hype is omnipresent, reality sometimes takes a lot of research to prevail. The use of electronic medical records has a lot of reasons to be a good thing. One of the biggest promotions for their use is that they will end up saving on medical spending. The most recent study, while the authors try to put things in the most positive light, demonstrates the unlikelihood that EHRS will aid in reducing overall health spending, even when implemented widely across a specific community. (Annals Article) The researchers tracked 806 ambulatory clinicians who adopted a subsidized EHR and compared spending and utilization for their patients versus a control group. The EHR group was in three communities and resulted in most clinicians in those communities having an EHR. The communities selected as the intervention group received a great deal of support and training for EHR use and implementation, which likely does not reflect the real world. While the researchers attempted to match clinicians and patients in the intervention and support groups, it is unclear how closely they, or more importantly, their patient populations were matched. Notwithstanding all the factors which should have led to a positive outcome, the EHR group showed no significant lower overall spending for their patients. There was a non-significant reduction in outpatient spending, with only a sub-category of ambulatory radiology showing statistically significant decline, a fact likely attributable to the many efforts to reduce imaging use going on during the study period. And this lack of medical spending savings does not take into account the cost of EHR systems and their impact on practice productivity. While the authors and much of the media make every effort to portray this research as demonstrating potential medical spending savings from use of EHRs, the results show nothing of the kind. What should be more important to everyone is whether their use improves quality and health outcomes.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 19, 2023
Tom Frieden Speaks in the WSJ
A public health expert writes an article for the WSJ which amply demonstrates why Americans…
Commentary
March 19, 2023
Why Ukraine Matters
Not supporting Ukraine is asking for far worse conflicts in the future.
Commentary
March 19, 2023
Tim Walz’ Minnesota Sucks
I am in the free state of Florida right now, but my home state is…