It is a common complaint about the US health system that it spends more for care without getting better quality. Yet another analysis about why we have relatively high health spending is found in a new Commonwealth Fund report, which looks at 13 industrialized nations and analyses reasons for variation. (Comm. Fund Report) Using OECD data and other sources, the authors looked at spending, supply, utilization, prices and quality. Some other developed countries spend only a third or two-thirds as much as the US on a per capita basis, but these figures are unadjusted for health status, sociodemographic and other factors. The US spends about 17.5% of GDP on health care, the next highest country is at only 12%, but this is partly a matter of choice by individual consumers in the US. The higher spending is unlikely to be related to an aging population, as several other countries have a higher average age, and the US has fewer smokers than other countries, so that is not a source of more spending. (Actually smokers probably have lower lifetime health costs since they don’t live as long, so that may help keep spending down.) But the US has far higher rates of obesity, which does seem linked to more health spending. And contrary to popular impressions, the US does not have excess health care resource supply or utilization, with very low relative numbers of physicians and per capita physician visits and fewer hospital beds and hospital stays. On the other hand, the average cost of a hospital stay in the US is much higher, $18,000 compared to less than $10,000 in several countries. Branded drug prices are much higher in America, although generic prices are lower on average, while charges for physician visits and procedures are significantly higher, and physicians, particularly specialists, have much higher incomes. Technology may also play a role in the higher US spending, but generally higher unit prices are undoubtedly the primary factor. And for our extra spending, our comparative quality is not significantly better, often worse, but those analyses often do not account for socio-demographic and health status.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
How to Waste an Election
November 6, 2024
How to Waste an Election
The new administration has to show determination to eliminate the deficit and begin reducing our…
Commentary
Credit Where Credit Is Due
November 6, 2024
Credit Where Credit Is Due
It has been an amazing campaign and Trump deserves all the credit for his perseverance.
Commentary
No Time for Gloating, Well, Maybe in One Respect its Okay
November 6, 2024
No Time for Gloating, Well, Maybe in One Respect its Okay
If you have come to despise Little Timmy, as I have, revel in his humiliation…