Health insurance exchanges are one prominent feature of the Massachusetts and federal health reforms. Through the exchanges people without access to other insurance can buy coverage. Depending on income level, much or all of the cost of the coverage may be subsidized. A recent article in Health Affairs summarizes a survey of families receiving insurance through the exchange in Massachusetts, but not receiving a subsidy and explored the effects on the families’ finances. (HA Article) The respondents came from only one health plan, and the total number was only 393 families, which is pretty small statistically. Most of these people were in the lower tiers of health plan types; those with relatively low actuarial coverage of total expected costs. This choice is to be expected for both lower income families, who would seek to minimize up-front premium costs, and higher income ones, who would be willing to accept the trade-off of higher ongoing out-of-pocket expenses. But since people likely underestimate their need for health care, being in a plan with high deductibles and copays can lead to surprises about out-of-pocket costs. One surprise from the survey was that as many as 30% of families who aren’t getting a subsidy, were eligible for one according to their self-reported level of income. But the researchers did not verify actual income. About 38% of the families said they experienced a financial burden in regard to health care, which meant they had difficulty paying medical bills, deferred care or had general financial problems due to medical costs. As would be expected, this reporting of financial burden was much higher for lower income families. A number of families also reported higher than expected costs under their coverage, which again, as might be expected, was greater with high-deductible and lower actuarial value plans. The authors suggest that these unsubsidized families need more help with tools to understand their likely medical needs and costs and to pick a plan accordingly. They also suggest that further subsidies may be needed for these families, but that will obviously just exacerbate the overall cost of these “reform projects”. Massachusetts is already swamped by the costs of its reform. It should be clear by now that this is not the right direction to take the health care system.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
The Decline of Minnesota
September 17, 2024
The Decline of Minnesota
Median real household income in Minnesota has declined sharply in Minnesota since 2019, while rising…
Commentary
The Goal of the Pro(re)gressives
September 17, 2024
The Goal of the Pro(re)gressives
The agenda of the whacked pro(re)gressives is clear--eliminate opponents' free speech, corrupt elections to maintain…
Commentary
Racist Anti-racists Are All About the Money
September 16, 2024
Racist Anti-racists Are All About the Money
Anti-racism is an industry that makes a lot of white people very rich.