With the advent of value-based purchasing, providers and health plans now see some of their compensation based upon patient experience or satisfaction ratings. Yet the science of satisfaction ratings is in its very early stages and the factors and meaning of ratings are poorly understood. A PriceWaterhouseCooper report describes the current state and use of health care ratings and patient satisfaction reports. (PWC Report) A variety of sources exist for patient satisfaction information. The federal government collects data from consumer surveys of all provider types in Medicare and for members of Medicare Advantage plans. Many Medicaid programs do the same. A number of states require health plans to collect patient satisfaction data and there are various private groups like NCQA, the National Business Group on Health and others that collect or encourage the collection of this data. Some large health plan and provider organizations seek this data on their own to improve marketing and member or patient retention. And in the world of the internet, there are a variety of consumer driven efforts to rate experiences with providers, products or health plans, including general consumer sites like Yelp. According to the report, many consumers are aware of the ability to access this kind of data. A big issue, however, is the trustworthiness and credibility of the data. On the internet, it is often not clear who is really doing the rating and their is usually no statistical validity to this kind of rating. While government and health plan created information may have more validity, its accessibility and usability for the average consumer may not be high. And it is not clear how closely linked patient satisfaction ratings are to actual health outcomes. We have a long way to go to figure out if all this patient satisfaction data actually has enough value to spend the time and effort creating and sharing it.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 21, 2023
Minnesota’s New Energy Insanity, Part 7
Minnesota is a particularly poor place to rely on solar power, but other states aren't…
Commentary
March 21, 2023
A Quick SVB Follow-up
As I suspected, the SVB saga is primarily one of regulatory malfeasance, coupled with political…
Commentary
March 19, 2023
Tom Frieden Speaks in the WSJ
A public health expert writes an article for the WSJ which amply demonstrates why Americans…