We all agree that health spending is high in the United States and that its growth rate needs to be slowed, if not stopped. Various prescriptions for slowing that spending, however, often seem to ignore research findings and to be heavier on theory and wishful thinking than on the realities and complexities of why a lot of money is spent on health care in the United States. The Commonwealth Fund created a commission to identify how we can create a better system and the commission has now issued its report, which unfortunately falls into the not-too-helpful category. (Commonwealth Fund Report) The report authors come up with a list of “synergistic” reforms which it says will save $2 trillion dollars in spending that would otherwise occur in the next ten years. The reforms include provider payment reform, basically value-based purchasing using delivery vehicles like ACOs and medical homes; policies that give consumers more information and help them make better decisions on quality and cost; and systemwide action to improve health markets, reducing admin costs and even setting regional and national growth targets. Sounds great. Encouraging provider consolidation through vehicles like ACOs, however, is only likely to exacerbate provider market power and ultimately lead to higher prices and premiums. There is no significant research suggesting that these vehicles actually will reduce costs. There is a limit to how rational consumers are about any purchasing decision, much less a complex, emotional subject like health care. Five percent of the population accounts for an alarming high percent of total spending and many of these people are really incapable of making decisions for themselves, especially those near the end-of-life, and their caregivers are very reticent to reduce the care these people receive. And government intervention in the health market has worked so well, we really should do a lot more of it. That is just a few quibbles about this fantasy idea of how health care spending can be reduced.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 21, 2023
Minnesota’s New Energy Insanity, Part 7
Minnesota is a particularly poor place to rely on solar power, but other states aren't…
Commentary
March 21, 2023
A Quick SVB Follow-up
As I suspected, the SVB saga is primarily one of regulatory malfeasance, coupled with political…
Commentary
March 19, 2023
Tom Frieden Speaks in the WSJ
A public health expert writes an article for the WSJ which amply demonstrates why Americans…