An article in the American Journal of Managed Care neatly illustrates the difficulty in reducing inappropriate care and expense. (AJMC Article) The commentary begins by referring to the Rand Health Insurance Experiment, which found that, in general, more cost sharing of various types by patients led to lower utilization and lower expenses. Rand also found that on average, health outcomes were the same with higher cost sharing, which means that lower utilization did not appear to affect the patients’ health. But Rand and others found that utilization of necessary services was reduced along with that of unnecessary ones, leading to a question about how outcomes could seem to be the same. The answer, Rand and others believe, is that unnecessary services can have adverse effects on health and can add further cost. If a patient has a procedure they didn’t really need, for example, there is the possibility of complications and errors, which add to cost and worsen the patient’s health. Reducing necessary services also has obvious bad effects. So the problem has been to take the generalized finding that cost sharing reduces spending without worsening outcomes, on average, and apply it patient by patient. This is an especially a concern for chronic disease sufferers, who may be most likely to skip needed care, and low income individuals, who may have greater price sensitivity. Two possible approaches are more patient education about choosing appropriate care and being involved in decisions about what care they receive, and greater use of value-based benefit designs, which lessen cost-sharing on high-value services such as preventive care and medications for chronic illnesses. Lessons include that any reform measures have to be carefully examined for unintended consequences and that getting to the goal of providing only necessary care for each patient will require spending more on care management.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Sidekick Health welcomes new investors, who pumped $55 million into “digital therapeutics”, another over-hyped supposedly disruptive health care trend. This involves the typical phone apps, etc. that will instantly make...
May 7, 2022
A company called Hello Heart raises a fresh $70 million in capital for yet another app that supposedly helps improve management of cardiac health. I despair about the sanity of...
May 3, 2022
Having private investors own health care facilities isn’t all bad. They may jack prices up mercilessly, but they don’t appear to hurt outcomes for care and may even improve them,...
April 30, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace