Renewable Energy Follies, June 30, 2026

By June 30, 2026Commentary2 min read

A modern society runs on electricity.  Inexpensive, reliable electricity generation would seem to be a critical focus for governments.  Due to climate hysteria, we instead have been focussing on “renewable” energy, primarily wind and solar.  These sources are 1) expensive; 2) unreliable and 3) environmentally damaging.  The unreliability is caused in part because the sun isn’t always shining and the wind isn’t always blowing.  Attempts to alleviate these concerns by building battery or other storage methods only add to point 1–they make electricity generation even more expensive, and to point 3–the life cycle of battery storage is very environmentally damaging and these facilities have a nasty habit of exploding into fires.

Solar and wind plants are also obviously exposed to nature’s whims and I find it hilarious that as we have carpeted our lovely countryside with tens of thousands of acres of solar and wind farms, nature takes delight in destroying them with wind, hail and other means.  Here is another story about wind turbines being shredded in high winds.  The disposal of these gargantuan wind towers is an environmental nightmare.  (ZH Post)

Meanwhile we have in the United States access to far cheaper, more reliable and safer electricity sources–natural gas and nuclear in particular.  We should be deriving our electricity from those sources and stop with the renewable energy nonsense.

Kevin Roche

Author Kevin Roche

The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry through Roche Consulting, LLC. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.

More posts by Kevin Roche

Join the discussion 4 Comments

  • BJ says:

    Kevin, I think you’re the only Minnesota resident that has any sense

    • Joe k says:

      Just drove through Iowa on I80.

      Between Des Moines & Iowa city, there were approximately 350 wind turbines (+-50).

      Approximately 30 were non operational- broken. 5%~10% down

      These are turbines that are 10-15 years old. That is not a good sign of the long term viability. It’s shows the bogus nature of LCOE renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel with the grossly overstated life expectancy of wind farms

  • Joe k says:

    Adding to my comment, google AI stated that non operating windows turbines are 1-2%. That is directly contrary to my personal observation

    Can we trust AI on politically charged topics?

  • BJ says:

    Joe,
    As to whether we can trust AI on these topics.
    No. It just makes left wing media lies more “authoritative”.

Leave a comment