An article discusses a recent Danish study on CV-19 seroprevalence and ties it to the lack of efficacy of the country’s typical lockdown, masking and other requirements. As the author notes and as we have shown with Minnesota data, these measures had no impact on infections, everyone got infected, usually multiple times. Some informative charts are included in the post. (CV-19 Post)
I am not sure what study he is referring to, there are several large Danish ones that include prevalence data. The most recent one is found here. It covers the primary period of the epidemic, from April 2022 through December 2022. If you look at the supplementary data you see what a huge percent of the population was infected by this time. (Danish Study)
As usual, my concern is that all this data on futility of intervention will be ignored the next time.
