I am pretty much done with CV-19, other than if I notice a particular study. I am not searching for or doing general summarizations any more. When it comes to vaccines, I have been very clear regarding my dubiousness on efficacy, especially now, and on the supposed safety issues. One clear safety issue that had a direct relationship to efficacy is heart inflammation and other circulatory system disorders in young people, which clearly were caused by the CV-19 vax in some cases. Since the vax were particularly ineffective in children and young adults, the typical benefit/risk analysis would definitely say don’t get the vax. The public health non-experts decreed otherwise, out of stubborn defensiveness.
But, as I also pointed out, for a clearly defined harm from the vax like this, there are higher rates of the same issue caused by an actual infection. So that should be taken into account in the benefit/risk analysis. A new study finds that for children and young adults in England, a CV-19 infection was significantly more likely to be associated with these heart issues than the CV-19 vax, although confidence intervals were wide. Even with that, for young people it seems to me foolish to get further CV-19 vaccinations. Older adults can consult their physicians and read up on the data and research for themselves. (Lancet Article)
I sold a dirt bike this spring to a gentleman in his late forties’ early fifties and in conversation with him he told me he developed chest pains after the first covid vaccine shot and he informed his doctor of the chest pain, but the doctor insisted, he receive the second shot for protection against covid. After the second shot he ended up in the hospital, he needed shock treatment to restore proper heart pulse rhythm. He now sees a heart specialist every year and was recently informed by his specialist the vaccine caused his heart issue. People get heart issues for different reasons so in some people did the vaccine find the weak link and move the issue to a younger age?
A question I do have and wish someone could explain it. The vaccine was injected in the body and instructed your RNA to manufacture a spike protein so the body would produce antibody response. This occurred throughout the body in the blood stream, I guess. Covid infection is a respiratory infection that starts infection in the respiratory tract. I read the infection needs to reach the lungs for the transfer to the blood stream to happen – true or not? I had Covid in November 2000, was not aware of it at the time, I knew I was fighting something it seemed minor. I did follow up with a anti body test several weeks later and tested positive for covid anti body. For a blood sample to show an antibody response from a respiratory disease does that mean the infection reached the lungs or can the blood sample show a response through a nasal infection only?
I believe that virus particles can reach the bloodstream from anywhere.