Skip to main content

There Is No Voter Fraud……

By December 13, 2023Commentary3 min read

There is no voter fraud.  Well, maybe there is a little bit.  Well, there may be some, but it isn’t widespread.  Well, maybe there is a fair amount, but it doesn’t affect election outcomes.  Well, maybe there is some, but if you are Democrats, it all benefits us, so who cares, in fact can we promote.  No voter ID doesn’t lead to voter fraud.  Mail in voting doesn’t lead to voter fraud.  Ballot harvesting doesn’t lead to voter fraud.

Every one of those sentences above is a lie.  You may recall earlier this year I posted on a good piece of research which identified a fairly large percent of voter fraud, largely centered on voting where you don’t live, including voting twice.  Now a Rasmussen survey is drawing attention because the respondents admitted to a truly massive amount of fraudulent voting.  The survey covered over 1000 likely voters in regard to the 2020 election.  Of non in-person voters, 20% said someone else filled out their ballot in whole or in part, and 21% said they filled out someone else’s ballot and 10% said they knew someone else who did so.  17% also said they signed someone else’s ballot without permission.  17% voted in a state where they were not eligible to do so because they no longer were a permanent resident of the state and 10% said they knew someone else who did so.  8% said they were paid or rewarded or offered to be paid or rewarded by a political party or some other person or organization to vote, presumably in a certain way.  (Rasmussen Survey)

Those are astounding numbers, Democrats stick their head in the sand on voter fraud because they actively encourage it and think they benefit.  Republicans are beginning to adopt the same tactics and the poll indicates roughly equal numbers participate in these behaviors.  If Republicans get as good at fraud as Democrats, then maybe everyone will think it is time to do something.  It is embarrassing for the world’s supposed leading democracy to have a system that openly encourages fraud in voting.  Other Western countries don’t allow anything like this.

I have given my solution before.  Only in-person voting except for the rarest of circumstances and if there is absentee voting it must be in the presence of at least two certified persons from different parties and meet all the requirements of in-person voting.  Create and keep constantly updated a national database of voters that must be used in every election at every level.  Validate the citizenship of every voter.  Have an election period of at least ten days, encompassing two weekends.  No early voting.  Voter ID for every voter.  Paper ballots that can be audited.  that would eliminate almost any opportunity for fraud, so don’t expect to see it soon.  The Rasmussen poll indicates that 94% of people would definitely vote in person and only 2% definitely wouldn’t if that was the only option, so there is no excuse for not implementing these recommendations.

Kevin Roche

Author Kevin Roche

The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry through Roche Consulting, LLC. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.

More posts by Kevin Roche

Join the discussion 3 Comments

  • Justin says:

    If anyone cares about elections ( feels like everyone has given up), they need to keep up with Peter Bernegger on Twitter. He is an independent election activist but in favor of the people and getting the truth out. He is a wizard with computer algorithms, queries, and open record requests. He lives in Wisconsin he has roughly 20 cases of election fraud open with the state of WI now from 2020. He has won 6 of 6 cases so far. A good starter would be to read this tweet as just yesterday he cracked the code on how Milwaukee cheated (Green Bay was already busted). The democratic cheat code was a copy/paste of cheating in the 7 largest swing state counties. My assumption is all the border crossers will be voting somewhere , somehow in the swing states as the govt now has databases that talk to each other and update voter info , corruptly or not, they dont care because the judicial system will never allow for signature matching or ballot review, its there own home team judges. We will keep hearing media blast polls are close and/or Biden down 5, its all a front. Here is the tweet/info, dont see anything being done about 2024.
    https://x.com/PeterBernegger/status/1734933503387566531?s=20

  • Larry Fitz says:

    Following Justin’s comment……Clearly in GA + AZ + WI in 2020 there is evidence of fraud. Collectively these states = 37 electoral votes that went for Biden. If switched to Trump, then he would have received 272 electoral votes and won. In 2000 the ballots in Florida were preserved, and they were recounted again manually with varying standards of the paper ballot “chads” and punch marks being counted. Overall the majority of these recounts showed a margin for Bush. I know of no case in 2020 for the States listed above that any similar recount was done. Once the envelope with signature is removed from the mail-in ballot, it is impossible to certify the validity. Unless voter roles are periodically checked, mail in ballots individually requested, and voter ID rules enforced……the validity of future elections will be in question. Re: Rasmussen: just like with the issue of “freedom of speech”, we are seeing a significant percentage of voters apparently OK with voter fraud, if it achieves their desired outcome.

  • dell says:

    Does the $50 million Gov. Walz and the DFL used to “get out the vote” count as fraud?

    They were repeatedly calling on the phone almost signing us up to vote, knocking on our door to fill out the forms, stopping us at Cub and other stores, mailing ballot items, holding meetings, etc. Our area, shell we say is a Walmart type of area and they were at the entrance!

    The above suggests they may have had unspecified intentions. A cynic might say they probably targeted less GOP type areas of Minnesota -mostly bluest of the blue and sanctuary / ‘refugee’ areas.

    They also claim it’s difficult to vote so need to get almost unlimited absentee voting.

    Really? In 1968, I was in the Central Highlands of Vietnam and I voted!

Leave a Reply to JustinCancel reply