I keep coming back to this because it was such an obvious fraudulent study. Here is the real chart on cases and mask mandates or no mandates in Kansas counties. Couldn’t be clearer that there is no difference.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
November 28, 2023
There’s a Hole in Uncle Sam’s Arm Where All the Money Goes
A graphic look at the revenue collected by the federal government and how much more…
Commentary
November 28, 2023
Another Survey of Employer Health Plans
More evidence of cost pressures on employer health plans.
Commentary
November 27, 2023
Reading in Minnesota
New laws in Minnesota to address reading declines in schools don't address the real problems.
I am late responding to this
I received the data file from KU
several obivious errors
1) cutting off study after 2 months
2) refusal to update study after the cutt off period
3) lots of clusters for the unmasked counties that heavily skewed the results
several other errors that I noticed back in sept when I looked at the study
thank you for sharing, do you mean the original data file? That is great. Everyone knew that was cooked up analysis.