Skip to main content

What I Am Grateful For and an Editorial

By November 25, 2020Commentary

I will once again say this with all my heart, I appreciate every single reader, I appreciate the way you have spread the blog, and I appreciate the many contributions you have made to the quality and quantity of the information able to be presented.  In return I will keep doing my best to provide information on relevant science, an occasional big picture sense of what the epidemic and the government responses look like, and some observations that hopefully don’t go overboard with sarcasm and dark humor, but that is a part of my personality.  The readership has grown another order of magnitude, from all across the country.  I believe this is becoming an important source for people to get actual science and relevant data analysis that they can’t see elsewhere.  So the one thing I would ask is that you all continue to share the blog as widely as you can and by whatever formats you can–linkedin, facebook, twitter, etc.  The more people who see a different perspective and get better data and science, the more likely our leaders will be pressured to act more rationally.

Below is a proposed op-ed piece I submitted to our local lead newspaper.  This newspaper, like most, has generally promoted the hysteria and avoided criticism of government responses.  I actually admire the job some of the reporters do, but I think  they are directed to push certain angles and not really ask uncomfortable questions.  I went back and forth with the editor responsible for columns, who I also respect, but it doesn’t appear I can satisfy their requirements.  Since the readership of the blog is close to or exceeds that of the paper, I decided to just publish the editorial as I submitted it here.  For readers, nothing new, probably in a milder form than I typically express the same thoughts in the blog.  The holdup appears to be over my statement that the Governor has taken, as have many Governors, to blaming the behavior of their citizens for the case surge.  In case there is any doubt, and there isn’t, that this is what the Governor believes, here is Jan Malcolm’s, who obviously speaks for the Governor, very clear statement of that position:  “If Minnesotans were just following the guidance that currently exists, we wouldn’t need further dial-backs.”  The Governor in multiple press conferences said the same thing, including again on Monday.  In any event, here is the proposed editorial:


As coronavirus cases have surged in the Upper Midwest and other parts of the country, a number of Governors have assigned blame to their citizens. Our Governor has taken the same course, claiming, with no support, that failure to follow recommended mitigation measures is the cause of the case rise, that Minnesotans’ behavior is at fault. He has warned that if we don’t change our behavior, cases, hospitalizations and deaths will rise even further.

Let’s examine the truth of that assertion. In order for some supposed behavior or lack of behavior to be associated with the case increase, the behavior would have to have changed before and along with the rise in cases. It hasn’t. In regard to mask wearing, for example, every survey shows that if anything mask wearing in the state has increased since the summer when cases were low. Mobility patterns haven’t changed, in fact, they have declined slightly in recent weeks, according to the CDC COVID Data Tracker. There is no demonstration that people are gathering more, in fact the opposite is almost certainly true when summer ends in Minnesota.

Since changes in behavior can’t account for the increase in cases, what does? The answer is obvious. Seasonal coronaviruses are called seasonal for a reason—they have a very clear seasonal pattern which peaks in the winter, diminishes in late spring and re-emerges in the fall. This coronavirus is following that pattern. The virus finds fall’s cooler, less humid weather and the much lower amount and intensity of sunshine a far more hospitable environment. These factors may be enhanced by changes in human biochemistry, such as lower vitamin D levels. What makes more sense, that a non-existent behavior change is responsible for more cases or that it is due to a well-documented seasonal pattern to coronaviruses?

The likelihood of a renewed increase in cases in the fall has been apparent since the start of the epidemic and the Governor has even referenced it in the past. Yet here we are, apparently completely unprepared for the extent of the case rise and in scrambling, panic mode again. That was somewhat understandable in the spring, but not now. And once again, we see actions taken to limit spread with no analysis of all the consequences, or even the likelihood of effectiveness against a respiratory virus that has shown itself to be extremely resistant to mitigation measures.

The Governor’s repertoire of responses to this epidemic has been largely incompetent and ineffective. He issued stay-at-home and business and school closure edicts with no analysis of the impact, including the effect on minorities and low-income persons, who always are the most hurt by such actions. And the citizens of the state as a result lost hundreds of thousands of jobs and thousands of businesses; children have been deprived of a meaningful educational and social experience; and thousands have missed needed health care.

Despite very early warning that this pathogen targeted the frail elderly, nothing was done to protect long-term care residents. Then when the disproportionate toll on this group was apparent, we were graced with the “battle plan”. If that is a war, coronavirus has won. We continue to see the vast majority of our deaths, around 75%, occurring among residents of these facilities.

He has sent the state down a massive testing rabbit hole, with no real purpose, which merely adds to the work of our thousands of contact tracers who haven’t been able to find the source of transmission of even half of the state’s known cases, much less all the undetected ones. Many of these tests result in false positives and low positives that don’t reflect infectious persons. People are put in quarantine limbo trying to figure out if they really are positive.

Despite claims of having the best data in the country and being very transparent, the state does not report on such basic issues as the actual date that deaths occur, not the date they are reported; the number of supposed coronavirus hospitalizations that were for another purpose and the patient happens to test positive; the number of hospitalizations in which the person acquired the infection in the hospital; daily hospital census; average length of stay; how the positivity rate is actually calculated; the distribution of cycle numbers on supposedly positive PCR tests and on and on. We get no reporting on the myriad health harms caused by his orders, including over 1500 Minnesotans over the average who have died of certain causes other than coronavirus. These unfortunates include dementia patients who are subjected to lethal isolation, cancer patients who have missed treatments and heart attack victims afraid to go to the emergency room.

Instead of leadership we get anectodal appeals to emotion, such as dragging out coronavirus sufferers to shame us all, and finger-wagging at our irresponsible actions. Instead of calm, rational reassurance, we have had a constant campaign of terrorization, which has led to people in the general population having an extremely exaggerated sense of the actual risk. Not once have we heard from the family of one of those excess non-coronavirus deaths, from the parents of children whose lives are being irreparably harmed by missing real school, from the families of suicides or drug overdoses prompted by despair, or a business owner whose dream has been shattered. Almost all Minnesotans have endured a serious diminution of their quality of life for over eight months. And now we are told it is largely our fault. The Governor might do well to look in the mirror before lecturing Minnesotans.

Join the discussion 17 Comments

  • Kevin Rademacher says:


    Awesome and spot on! Thanks for saying the things that we Minnesotans can’t because we don’t have a broad enough platform. I truly hope this op-ed gets published and includes a comment section in their digital prints. I seriously doubt it will get published and if it does, it will be restricted to only print papers without comments or digital subscribers with no comments allowed. So, I will be sharing this with my friends/family and larger audiences on social media. I would encourage others to do so as well.

    Thanks for being our voices of reason and the continued wealth of actual facts and reports. We don’t get it from our local media.


  • Peggy A Lewis says:


    Most excellent. I’m sharing with 20 like minded people today.

    Keep chipping away…You’re words will be written in the annals of future humanist publications. I just know it!

  • Brenda says:

    My thoughts exactly but nicer. Thank you for your efforts & keep publishing! People need to keep hearing truths.

  • Dan says:

    God bless you sir…so truthful..

  • Chet says:

    Thank you for all you’ve been doing throughout this mess, Kevin. It’s a privilege to be able to read and understand so much more as a result of your efforts.

    And as usual, your above assessment is spot on!

  • Mike Goergen says:

    Great commentary. Perhaps you can get it published in some other papers around the state or upper midwest. You could also publish on and reach a broader audience.

  • Debbie says:

    Will you marry me…or at least run for Governor? Awesome! Your blog keeps me sane, well as sane as possible. Thanks, Kevin!

  • Mike Timmer says:

    Like those commenting before me, you’ve composed a concise and accurate description of the situation here in Minnesota. As to the Star Tribune, it is publishing nothing more than propaganda deservedly earning the the title of Red StarTrib. It is morally and politically reprehensible editorial policy to keep the public shielded from eminently reasonable opinion, especially that which is based on sound scientific method and supported by the sources you identify. This smothering of alternative viewpoints will be the death of a healthy republic in more than one way if not repudiated sooner than later. I thank you, and Scott Johnson also, for your persistence in looking for the truth in all things political.

  • Chuck says:

    Shocking the Star – Tribune won’t publish your editorial!

    Maybe if you asked that editor to “neuter” it to meet their “Standards”? Maybe the editor’s version would be “more reader friendly”???

  • Turd Ferguson says:

    Maybe you could get it to Jeremy Olsen and have him publish it for you…

  • Harley says:

    Kevin, you are tireless at your work, are so good at explaining science to non-scientists, and your opinions are thoughtful and spot on. Always.
    I am thankful to have been exposed to this blog earlier this year, and find it a bright light in a foggy world. Have a Happy Thanksgiving!

    (FWD, FWD, FWD…..)

  • Caroline says:

    I am not shocked by how many Minnesotans defend Totalitarian Timmy. Most citizens in this State have Stockholm Syndrome.

  • dell says:

    At 1,339 words it many not make the size cut.
    Try 750 or even 500 words and see if is published.
    Censorship is spreading. So sad.
    What you are saying needs to be read.
    Happy Thanksgiving.

  • paulinmontana says:

    “… including the effect on minorities and low-income persons, who always are the most hurt by such actions.”

    Low-income I understand. But why would **minorities** be especially at risk?

  • Rob says:

    It’s one thing for news outlets to have bias – it’s a natural human thing. But it’s completely unethical for news outlets to run interference for politicians.

    Arrogance before a fall – it’s just a shame that political arrogance causes the fall of so many others.

  • anthony d says:

    The Democrat governors who started by exercising draconian authority over their “subjects” and who, like Walz, are now blaming their “subjects” for the spread of a highly infectious virus, epitomize Nietzsche’s apt summary:
    “There is nothing as frightening as ignorance in action.”

Leave a comment