One of the problems in knowing how intensively to treat seriously ill patients is having a good sense of their prognosis. For cancer in particular, there is often a time when further treatment is relatively futile, the patient is likely terminal and palliative care may be more appropriate. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open discusses a predictive algorithm that determines likely mortality for head and neck cancer patients. (JAMA Article) About 16,000 patients in Taiwan with an advanced form of the cancer were studied. All had completed a course of chemoradiotherapy. The 90 day mortality rate was measured after completion of this therapy. The algorithm was designed to see if it could predict which patients were most likely to die. Other studies had indicated that mortality rates in the near-term after therapy ranged from 5% to 18%. Obviously for people who die within 90 days after the therapy, it was relatively futile to have had the treatment. And these treatments are not without discomfort to the patient. So being able to identify who is not likely to see longer term benefit allows for better patient counseling and decision-making. A large number of patient demographic and health variables was included in the search for meaningful associations to add to a predictive algorithm. Factors which appeared to have any meaningful association with 90-day mortality were selected into the algorithm and it was run against the study population. The overall mortality rate was 6.66%. The most significant factors associated with risk of dying appear to be being older and having certain comorbidities, such as pneumonia, heart disease and stroke. The algorithm divided patients into very low risk of death, low risk of death, moderate risk of death and high risk of death. There were significant differences in survival among these groups, indicating that the algorithm had a high level of success in predicting mortality risk and could be used to help identify patients who should be treated and those for whom treatment had a lower likelihood of success and for whom palliative care might be a more reasonable alternative. Assuming they have a high level of accuracy, predictive algorithms can help guide care for people with serious illness.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
In an attempt to swiftly revive two floundering health care companies, a PE firm has announced the merger and recapitalization of Revive Health and SwiftMD. You know they are...
January 30, 2023
Investors have not yet learned their lesson, as Pearl Health gathers a new round of $75 million in capital for its business of supporting physicians who want to participate in...
January 30, 2023
Now here is a tale from the glory days of epidemic investing, as the Feds pumped trillions into the economy and a lot of it went to investing, some to...
January 10, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace