There continue to be concerns about whether CMS overpays Medicare Advantage plans relative to the cost of enrollees if they were in the fee-for-service branch of Medicare. One thing that is pretty clear is that Medicare Advantage generally saves beneficiaries money. A UnitedHealth Group brief gives examples of those savings. (UHG Brief) The brief focuses on relative costs for a 72 year-old beneficiary in average health. It looks at both premium costs and out-of-pocket spending. FFS Medicare covers about 83% of costs for hospital and physician services. Beneficiaries also pay a Part B premium that is dependent on income. And if they are in Part D, the drug coverage, they may have an additional premium. Medicare Advantage plans almost always include drug coverage. They tend to have minimal cost-sharing amounts and increasingly, do not charge an additional premium to the enrollee. They also may cover services not covered at all by Medicare. The analysis finds that this average beneficiary would pay $5109 in premiums and cost-sharing for FFS Medicare annually if they were enrolled in Part D as well, $5441 if they were enrolled in Part D and a lower level Medicare Supplement plan and $5960 if they were enrolled in the highest level Medicare Supplement plan. By contrast, that beneficiary in a Medicare Advantage plan with drug coverage would have only $3632 per year in out-of-pocket spending. That is a 30% to 40% saving for the beneficiary. And it doesn’t include the value of the added benefits a Medicare Advantage plan typically provides. So it is no wonder that MA has seen extensive enrollment growth in the last few years, especially among lower-income beneficiaries. Unfortunately, CMS isn’t probably doing as well. Most analyses suggest that CMS might now be paying slightly less for the same beneficiary if they are in Medicare Advantage versus the fee-for-service arm of Medicare. That is Congress’ fault for not setting the payment mechanism in a manner that forces the plans to compete more directly on price. Research pretty definitively suggests that Medicare Advantage plans have lower actual health spending on the same beneficiary than that beneficiary would incur in fee-for-service Medicare. But most of that spending difference accrues to the benefit of the MA plans, which are generally pretty profitable, and therefore eager to increase their MA business.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Cano Health apparently cannot, as it declares bankruptcy due to too much debt. Building primary care centers to serve Medicare, Medicaid and commercial populations, which is Cano’s business, was hot...
February 6, 2024
Turquoise health raises a fresh $30 million in capital for its price transparency platform, as the market for funding health care companies isn’t quite dead yet.
January 24, 2024
I am co-f0under of a company that manages cell and gene therapy for health plans. Cell therapy has made a big difference for many cancer patients but like all new...
January 24, 2024
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace