There continue to be concerns about whether CMS overpays Medicare Advantage plans relative to the cost of enrollees if they were in the fee-for-service branch of Medicare. One thing that is pretty clear is that Medicare Advantage generally saves beneficiaries money. A UnitedHealth Group brief gives examples of those savings. (UHG Brief) The brief focuses on relative costs for a 72 year-old beneficiary in average health. It looks at both premium costs and out-of-pocket spending. FFS Medicare covers about 83% of costs for hospital and physician services. Beneficiaries also pay a Part B premium that is dependent on income. And if they are in Part D, the drug coverage, they may have an additional premium. Medicare Advantage plans almost always include drug coverage. They tend to have minimal cost-sharing amounts and increasingly, do not charge an additional premium to the enrollee. They also may cover services not covered at all by Medicare. The analysis finds that this average beneficiary would pay $5109 in premiums and cost-sharing for FFS Medicare annually if they were enrolled in Part D as well, $5441 if they were enrolled in Part D and a lower level Medicare Supplement plan and $5960 if they were enrolled in the highest level Medicare Supplement plan. By contrast, that beneficiary in a Medicare Advantage plan with drug coverage would have only $3632 per year in out-of-pocket spending. That is a 30% to 40% saving for the beneficiary. And it doesn’t include the value of the added benefits a Medicare Advantage plan typically provides. So it is no wonder that MA has seen extensive enrollment growth in the last few years, especially among lower-income beneficiaries. Unfortunately, CMS isn’t probably doing as well. Most analyses suggest that CMS might now be paying slightly less for the same beneficiary if they are in Medicare Advantage versus the fee-for-service arm of Medicare. That is Congress’ fault for not setting the payment mechanism in a manner that forces the plans to compete more directly on price. Research pretty definitively suggests that Medicare Advantage plans have lower actual health spending on the same beneficiary than that beneficiary would incur in fee-for-service Medicare. But most of that spending difference accrues to the benefit of the MA plans, which are generally pretty profitable, and therefore eager to increase their MA business.
Medicare Advantage Savings for Beneficiaries
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Deaths in the United Kingdom
September 12, 2024
Deaths in the United Kingdom
Identifying what happened with mortality and death rates before and after the epidemic is complex,…
Commentary
Inflation, Interest Rates and Domestic Migration
September 11, 2024
Inflation, Interest Rates and Domestic Migration
Inflation is higher than desired and will stay that way and interest rates will remain…
Commentary
Climate is Complex
September 9, 2024
Climate is Complex
Natural processes and cycles are responsible for almost all the variation in global weather and…