Bundled payments have been explored as a method to encourage care coordination and potentially save money for an episode of care. Medicare and other payers have now routinized their use for certain procedures, like joint replacement. Like everything in health care, you want to know if they are working as hoped. A Health Affairs article summarizes current research on bundled payments. (HA Article) The authors conducted a meta-review, in which they attempted to identify all studies looking at bundled payments and compile the outcomes. They covered four categories of outcomes: spending, utilization, quality and unintended consequences. They found 20 relevant studies published from 2016 to 2019. Sixteen of the studies evaluated spending for Medicare bundled payment programs. Several found reductions in total spending, but a few others found either slight increases or no significant change. Ten studies evaluated hospital inpatient spending in regard to bundled payments and most showed no change. So overall it appears that using bundled payments at best has shown a minor decrease in spending. Twelve studies looked at utilization. In general these studies found that there were fewer discharges to either inpatient type post-acute facilities or home health agencies under bundled payments. In regard to hospital length of stay, most research found a significant decline in days; the results were mixed for length of stay at post-discharge inpatient settings. 18 studies looked at the effect of bundled payments on readmission rates. About half found a decline and the rest showed no significant effect. In terms of unintended consequences, five studies which looked at whether hospitals were avoiding higher risk patients found no change. It should be noted that most of the research, and the studies that tended to find benefits, were conducted in regard to orthopedic procedures like joint replacement. There was less research, and less positive evidence, in regard to other clinical conditions. Bundled payments appear to do no harm, so they probably are worth continuing to explore, and they may provide stronger benefits over a longer period of time, as providers adjust to them. But it is also likely that providers will figure out how to maximize their revenue under bundled payments, as they have done with every other payment innovation.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
An Outstanding but Relatively Unknown Writer, Charles McCarry
September 14, 2024
An Outstanding but Relatively Unknown Writer, Charles McCarry
The author Charles McCarry was an outstanding writer and prescient in his understanding of what…
Commentary
More Good News from the Federal Government
September 14, 2024
More Good News from the Federal Government
Social Security is going broke even faster than previously projected.
Commentary
Mental Health by Political Preference
September 13, 2024
Mental Health by Political Preference
Especially for young women, buying into whacko leftist ideologies is a recipe for having mental…