We are near the end of the annual open enrollment period for Medicare Advantage. While current fee-for-service beneficiaries can take this opportunity to join an MA plan, it is also a chance for those beneficiaries already in a plan to switch. Different plans may have different costs and other advantages or disadvantages for a beneficiary and there are tools available to help people do this analysis. So how often do people actually switch? A timely Kaiser Family Foundation analysis examines this question. (KFF Analysis) The analysis covers open enrollment periods from 2007 to 2016 and looks at plan-switching for both Medicare Advantage plans that include drug coverage and standalone drug plans. During the 2016 open enrollment period only 7.6% of MA enrollees without a low-income subsidy switched to another MA plan and .9% switched back to traditional Medicare. In that year 8.3% of drug plan enrollees who were not eligible for the low-income subsidy switched to a different stand-alone drug plan and 1.7% went to a full MA plan. There is another roughly 8% of MA members and 3% of drug plan members whose current plan terminates but they are automatically switched to a new plan from the same insurer. These numbers were consistent with the earlier open enrollment periods in the study time frame and the great majority of Medicare Advantage members have never switched plans. In fact in 2017, 45% of people on Medicare said they never look at their Medicare options, and 57% of those over age 85 were in this group. 35% of beneficiaries said it is hard to compare options, a share that was higher for sicker beneficiaries. Now most people could stay in their plans because they are satisfied with them, but low switching rates could also be due to the difficulty of comparing and making a selection. Other research has suggested that many beneficiaries are not in an optimal plan for their situation. This inertia is good for the insurers–it lowers their overall cost of sales and marketing, but it may not be best for consumers. Other tools or processes may be needed to help beneficiaries make more active and informed choices.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
May 31, 2023
Medical Inflation is Real
A long-running report on the health care costs of a typical family reveals higher growth…
Commentary
May 31, 2023
The Damage from the Epidemic Response
A great paper summarizes the harms from the epidemic response.
Commentary
May 30, 2023
Whacko Progressives Really Are Violent Authoritarians
Research for once accords with common sense, extreme progressives are in fact narcissistic, violent authoritarians.