It is kind of funny to see one part of our massive federal government critiquing the actions of another part. You have to wonder what the Government Accounting Office knows about quality of care measures, but here they are giving us their perspective on Medicare’s quality program. Not that there isn’t a lot to be critical of. (GAO Report) CMS spends something like $30 million a year on quality measure development. It has a bewildering array of quality improvement efforts, such as health care associated infection reduction and hospital readmission reduction, as well as more general ones related to value-based purchasing. CMS relies on the National Quality Forum to actually develop and test most of the measures. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, among other groups, has noted that it would be better if CMS consolidated all these into one program and reduced the number of measures. GAO avoided directly commenting on these issues. But the primary GAO finding was that CMS has no systematic program to ensure that the measures it develops and uses are actually measuring or improving quality, which seems like it might be an important thing to do. In fact, there was a lack of documentation regarding how measures were selected and tested. That surprised me a little bit, because if you read the annual provider payment rules, there is always some discussion about quality measures, often with a great deal of detail on why certain measures are being used. GAO also noted that CMS was unable to directly explain how or if it spent the funds Congress specifically allocated for quality programs. No surprise there. GAO’s recommendations were largely process ones, which again likely reflects the fact that the Office doesn’t really have the capability to assess quality of care programs. Better for the government and the public to instead pay attention to MedPAC recommendations, as that group has extensive experience and staff expertise in the quality of care arena. These measures have real consequences–they can result in financial penalties to providers and they may lead providers to expend resources to do better on quality measures which really don’t make a clinical difference for patients. There is no question that all the quality reporting obligations placed on providers by Medicare and other payers jack up administrative costs and distract provider staff from the actual delivery of care to patients. So much greater care should be taken in developing and using quality measures.
GAO Report on Medicare’s Quality Measures
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
April 18, 2024
Progress Against Cancer
The US has made particularly good progress in treating cancer and limiting mortality, but much…
Commentary
April 17, 2024
I Am Done With Coronamonomania, Part 4, Vax Safety Edition
A somewhat lengthy examination of recent studies related mostly to vax safety, the results of…
Commentary
April 16, 2024
Concentration of US Health Spending
Another version of my favorite brief on who is responsible for health is out, with…