Malpractice claims are a fear of every health care provider, for both the reputational and financial hit. A new piece of research in the journal Diagnosis evaluates the source of malpractice suits. (Diagnosis Study) The researchers looked at data from 2006 to 2015 from a large national malpractice insurer’s database, which includes over a quarter of all malpractice claims. They ranked the frequency and seriousness of various kinds of professional negligence claims, with death obviously being the most serious. There have been some pretty wild assertions about the prevalence of diagnostic error and the number of deaths and other harm resulting from those errors, so the authors were trying to find a more objective source of data. Out of over 55,000 closed claims, 11,600 were diagnostic in nature and about 7380 of these involved high-severity harm, including 53% that related to a death. Three diseases accounted for 74% of all these high-severity cases, with vascular issues representing 23%, infections 13.5% and cancer 38%. Clinical judgment lapses appeared to be the primary cause in most of these cases and communication issues were also frequently present. Most cases arose in an ambulatory setting, with the emergency room particularly prone to claims. 51% of cases involved a primary care physician. Somewhat surprisingly, infection cases had the highest median payouts, vascular issues had intermediate ones and cancer the lowest. The results from this study, if extended to the full set of claims, suggest that over this period there were over 12,000 deaths resulting from diagnostic errors, but the database only reflects closed claims so time attribution is uncertain, but it is likely that most serious cases of potential negligence are represented, since providers have every incentive to report such events to their insurers. While the estimates derived from this research are substantially lower than from some other sources, they still represent serious harm to a significant number of patients, harm which should be avoidable. And the fact that a few diseases account for so many serious claims indicates that further training and safety processes directed at those diseases could reduce malpractice significantly.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Two health care firms owned by private equity firms are merging in a transaction supposedly valued at $3 billion. HealthComp administers self-funded plans for employers and other groups and Virgin...
September 27, 2023
NextGen, an electronic medical records firm, is being put out of its public company misery, as a PE firm will pay $1.6 billion for the one-time high-flier.
September 7, 2023
A number of companies which attracted large financing rounds during the epidemic have imploded when reality set in. The latest is Cano Health, which is a little surprising since it...
August 15, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace