It is pretty well-accepted that better primary care can keep patients in good health and potentially lower long-term spending. This supposedly occurs through delivery of more preventive care, early identification of potentially acute episodes and the role of a primary care doctor as a care coordinator. A new study looks at how much Medicare spends on primary care as a proportion of total spending. (JAMA Int. Med. Article) Depending on whether you define a primary care practitioner broadly or narrowly (the broader definition includes nurse practitioners and physician assistants, gynecologists and geriatricians in addition to family practice, pediatricians and internal medicine, so it seems obvious to me that the broad definition is more appropriate) and whether you define primary care services broadly or narrowly; primary care spending ranged from 2.12% to 4.88% of all spending. In annual dollars per beneficiary the range was $308.32 to $708.23. Arguably these amounts are not representative of true primary care spending, as they don’t include medications or tests ordered by primary care clinicians. Those items should properly be considered part of primary care. Spending as a percent tends to be higher for younger beneficiaries, probably because they don’t have as many serious conditions as older ones. There was also some variation among states. I suspect all of this analysis is highly correlated with actual health status. The authors don’t explicitly comment on whether they view the number as too low or too high, but the implication is that Medicare isn’t spending enough on primary care, given its supposed value. I am not sure either, but I think this kind of analysis really isn’t very helpful for policymakers. Many patients with one serious illness may use a specialist for that disease category as a primary care doctor. Some of the effect on spending is a unit price impact; primary care doctors tend to be much lower paid and reimbursed than are specialists. If you looked at primary care as a percent of utilization it would be a higher portion of all Medicare utilization than it is a percent of spending. And there has been some research trying to elucidate the actual impact of “better” primary care, and the results of that body of research are somewhat inconclusive. Getting patients in better health and achieving better health care outcomes is important, but I am not sure we know yet how much primary care has to do with that.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
December 13, 2024
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
Minnesota has negative after-inflation personal income growth as the Incompetent Blowhard's policies destroy the state's…
Commentary
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
December 13, 2024
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
Its over, Johnny, its over, but there is still time left to have some fun.
Commentary
Quantum Computing
December 12, 2024
Quantum Computing
Quantum computing is pretty fascinating and getting closer to common use.