A couple of weeks ago we learn that the Medicare hospital readmissions reduction program may have actually increased mortality, not exactly a good ultimate health outcome. Now we learn, via research in Health Affairs, that the previous estimates of readmission reductions were too high. (HA Article) Just to briefly recapitulate the program, there was a perception that there were a lot of unnecessary hospital readmissions within 30 days of a discharge, which was supposedly an indicator of poor quality and had Medicare paying for avoidable care. The reduction program penalizes hospitals that have readmission rates in excess of “expected” ones for three common conditions. Hospitals have incurred fairly substantial penalties since the program’s inception. It has been heavily criticized for a variety of methodological issues, including penalizing hospitals for things beyond their control, like bad patient behavior. But supposedly the program has been successful at reducing readmissions, albeit at the cost of a few patient lives. One prior study suggested that the apparent reduction was due to gaming the “expected” number by increasing patient risk scores, kind of like what MA plans do. In the current study, the authors look at changes in the system used by hospitals to submit claims to Medicare, which more than doubled the number of diagnosis codes hospitals could submit for a patient. The change occurred after CMS announced the reduction program but before it was implemented. And guess what, if you had used the more limited code set, you would have only seen about half the reduction that supposedly occurrred, as calculated using the large diagnosis code set, and consequent higher patient risk scores. Oops. But wait, there is more, if you correctly constructed control groups for reductions in readmissions by using non-targeted hospitals and non-targeted conditions, adjusting for baseline differences and using consistent risk-scoring methodology, most of the rest of the apparent reduction due to the program disappears. Double-oops. So CMS penalized a lot of hospitals for doing nothing wrong in regard to readmissions. Time for CMS to declare victory and dump the program. Maybe issue an apology to hospitals too.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Best Buy is another large corporation trying to make a bet on health care, in this case largely by providing remote patient monitoring services. The company made yet another significant...
October 13, 2021
Just so men don’t feel left out, a company called Numan has raised $40 million for an app, yada, yada, yada, helping men with ED and other health issues. Also...
October 11, 2021
Money streams in to Flo, which sells an app for women to track menstrual cycles, etc. Investors hope they won’t be left up a creek. $100 million in financing that...
October 11, 2021
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace