Two highly sympathetic industry sub-segments, hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry, are slugging it out to see who can rip taxpayers and consumers off the most in regard to drugs covered by the 340B program. The latest “research” to support one side or the other comes from BRG and supports the drug manufacturers attempts to cut the program back. Just so we are clear, hospitals are massively abusing the program, but drug makers only want to end that so they charge more money to payers and keep the profits for themselves. (BRG Paper) The paper builds on earlier work from the Government Accounting Office and Milliman suggesting that hospitals in the 340B program expanded use beyond that intended and made large profits from the program. The researchers attempted to identify whether hospitals that became part of the 340B program had different spending trends than those that did not. 379 hospitals met this criteria and claims data was used to identify spending patterns on over 1.9 million patients at these hospitals who had at least one encounter before and after 340B enrollment. On average, per patient weighted average drug spend increased 32.4% in the year after 340B enrollment. Hmmm, that does seem a little suspicious. So what happened with a similar group of patients at hospitals that didn’t enroll in the program. Their spending increased only 13.4%, so there was almost a 20 percentage point difference in drug spending growth. Repeating the analysis on a per patient date of service basis finds an even larger gap in drug spending trend. Not every hospital showed this trend, but 63% of the 340B ones had a trend at least 2 percentage points over the control group. There appeared to be little difference in urban versus rural hospitals or teaching versus non-teaching facilities. Morbidity scores and score growth rate appeared similar across the hospitals as well. Seems to be little doubt that once hospitals get in the 340B program they prescribe more drugs and more expensive ones, on which they have higher margin opportunities. Just scummy behavior. And of course Congress is sitting on its hands, failing to address the problem. Wonder if all those hospital contributions have anything to do with that? And even if we got rid of the program, you can assume the drug companies won’t do anything to make their products more affordable. Great holiday thoughts!
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
What do you get when you combine a company with a commodity business model, that out of desperation massively overpays for another company that has a commodity business model? $10...
July 27, 2022
The “stupid” model for health care venture capital investing is alive and well. Everside health, which operates primary care clinics and has grown by acquiring other failing health care businesses,...
July 26, 2022
Apparently not even a cute name can save you if you have a stupid business. I constantly bemoan the mis-application of capital and health care is Exhibit A. Olive, another...
July 26, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace