Imagine that you are a patient and you have to go to the hospital for a surgery or for treatment of some serious condition. You are anxious to begin with, but likely unaware that one big new risk that you may encounter during your stay is contracting an infection. Seems cruelly ironic but it happens quite frequently. CMS and others have created intensive initiatives and incentives to try to drive down the rates of these infections acquired in hospitals. And they appear to be garnering results, according to an analysis in the New England Journal of Medicine. (NEJM Article) The analysts from the Centers for Disease Control looked at changes from 2011 to 2015 in infection rates in ten states that participated in a special survey. About 3.2% of patients who were hospitalized in the 2015 survey had a health care associated infection, compared to 4% in 2011. After adjustments, patients had about a 16% less likelihood of contracting an infection in the hospital in 2015. Many infections are related to use of a catheter or other invasive device or equipment which creates a pathway for pathogens. If a patient did not have such a device, their risk of infection dropped by 24%. The most common infection was pneumonia, along with gastrointestinal infections and surgical site complications. The percentage of patients with pneumonia, GI infections or bloodstream infections did not change significantly, but their were lower percentages with surgical site or urinary tract infections. Many of these infections occurred in critical care units. Older patients, use of a ventilator or central catheter, length of stay, hospital size and rural or urban location were also linked to infection rates. While rates have declined, it is apparent that there are still many opportunities for further improvement. The survey helps by identifying where the focus should be and it appears to relate to use of invasive equipment and to pneumonia. Hospital-acquired infections are expensive to treat but they also significantly diminish the quality of life of a patient while hospitalized and pose a risk of death. They are worthy of continued substantial attention.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 30, 2023
Gee, Why Could People Possibly Want to Leave Minnesota
Minnesota has no population growth, due to crazy DFL policies, while Florida and Texas experience…
Commentary
March 30, 2023
Wait, Dems Are Concerned About Fake Voters?
Minnesota's progressive lunatics discover the virtues of voter id.
Commentary
March 29, 2023
Whacked Progressives Embrace Nihilism
Progressives are pro-regressive and have essentially become nihilists--believing in nothing and seeking to destroy civil…