Collectively the health plans run under a Blue Cross Blue Shield association license provide health coverage to the single greatest number of Americans. In many states these plans are dominant health insurers. They used to all be “non-profit” but many have converted to for-profit status, i.e. Anthem, in the last decade or so. Sherlock Company does a great job of tracking health plan performance and released a new analysis of trends in Blue Cross plan administrative expenses. (Sherlock Report) For 2017 these costs rose 5.9%, the largest growth rate in several years. If taxes were included, there would have been a decline, but that was caused by the recent federal insurance tax suspension for a year. On a per member basis, the change was 5.1%. The insured business experienced a membership decline, while self-funded plan administration grew. Self-funded plans are generally cheaper to administer, making the overall increase seem even higher. On a per member basis, assuming a constant mix of plan types, sales and marketing represented a significant part of the rise, about 10.7%, the same as medical and provider management activities. Within the sales bucket, underwriting and rating was a sub-function with rapid growth. Perhaps a perception of greater competition led to more spending on sales and marketing and on rating. There were higher costs in the sub-functions of employer group reporting and broker commissions as well. Harder to know why medical and provider management activities would increase at such a rapid rate. The sub-functions with particular growth were provider audits and provider network management. In the general category of corporate services, accounting for a 9.3% rise, the executive function contributed to the strong growth in expenses. Looks like executives got big bonuses for better financial performance. Charitable contributions also were up, not clear if executive bonuses fall into this category. Account and membership administration had the lowest rate of growth, at 3%. Information systems is part of this category and had modest growth. Spending money on administrative costs is not the best use of premium dollars, so we would hope that Blues plans are able to rein in this level of increase.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
It may be investors that need the redesign. They just keep pouring money into this digital health crap despite all the losses. Redesign Health claims that it makes money by...
September 16, 2022
In truth, this seems like more money down a rathole. Google’s parent and other investors are putting a billion dollars into Google’s health arm, Verily. Apparently want to compete with...
September 12, 2022
It is like investors have learned nothing from the past two years. Even supposedly smart investors like Morgan Health, which is making a $20 million contribution to LetsGetChecked, which supposedly...
September 12, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace