Collectively the health plans run under a Blue Cross Blue Shield association license provide health coverage to the single greatest number of Americans. In many states these plans are dominant health insurers. They used to all be “non-profit” but many have converted to for-profit status, i.e. Anthem, in the last decade or so. Sherlock Company does a great job of tracking health plan performance and released a new analysis of trends in Blue Cross plan administrative expenses. (Sherlock Report) For 2017 these costs rose 5.9%, the largest growth rate in several years. If taxes were included, there would have been a decline, but that was caused by the recent federal insurance tax suspension for a year. On a per member basis, the change was 5.1%. The insured business experienced a membership decline, while self-funded plan administration grew. Self-funded plans are generally cheaper to administer, making the overall increase seem even higher. On a per member basis, assuming a constant mix of plan types, sales and marketing represented a significant part of the rise, about 10.7%, the same as medical and provider management activities. Within the sales bucket, underwriting and rating was a sub-function with rapid growth. Perhaps a perception of greater competition led to more spending on sales and marketing and on rating. There were higher costs in the sub-functions of employer group reporting and broker commissions as well. Harder to know why medical and provider management activities would increase at such a rapid rate. The sub-functions with particular growth were provider audits and provider network management. In the general category of corporate services, accounting for a 9.3% rise, the executive function contributed to the strong growth in expenses. Looks like executives got big bonuses for better financial performance. Charitable contributions also were up, not clear if executive bonuses fall into this category. Account and membership administration had the lowest rate of growth, at 3%. Information systems is part of this category and had modest growth. Spending money on administrative costs is not the best use of premium dollars, so we would hope that Blues plans are able to rein in this level of increase.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
October 4, 2023
Electric Cars for Everyone, so Rich People Can Get Richer
Everything about electric cars is expensive, including insurance, but rich people get richer from them.
Commentary
October 3, 2023
Minnesota’s Modeling Nightmare
Minnesota finally wants to figure out how epidemic modeling was so bad, but the Strib…
Commentary
October 3, 2023
Reality Intrudes Again on the Renewable Energy Delusion
Solar and wind power are the most expensive forms of electricity and the cost of…