Medical costs are the largest component of workers’ compensation payments and have grown very rapidly in recent years, prompting the application of managed care techniques. The Workers’ Compensation Research Institute issues a regular report on trends in medical costs. The one recently released covers 35 states which account for 87% of workers’ compensation payments, and is based on actual payments. (WCRI Report) Some states try to regulate costs through use of fee schedules, others allow networks or other tactics to control costs, and some are more free-for-all. States tend to refine their fee schedules regularly and some states, such as California, have moved more to a Medicare-like mechanism in the past few years. The analysis reveals substantial variation in prices paid across states. For professional services, for example, prices ranged from 26% below the 35-state median in Florida to over 150% above it in Wisconsin. States with no fee schedule had much higher prices, from 39% to 168% greater, than the median price of states with fee schedules. Similarly, growth in prices over the period 2008 to 2017 was as low as a negative 17% in Illinois to plus 39% in Wisconsin; and states with no fee schedule also had much higher increases in prices. Total price growth was 30% in the non-fee schedule states versus 6% in the fee schedule ones. (Note that most commercial health plans would have been thrilled even with the 30% number over that time period.) Non-fee schedule states were able to achieve some moderation in price rises by use of other techniques, like allowing limited networks, where workers’ comp payers then have leverage to get lower prices. Most significant changes in prices, up or down, were related to fee schedule changes, either a comprehensive overall, or in some cases, changes to the prices paid for specific types of services. The states which had major recent fee schedule price changes experienced significant political battles over those changes. When prices are regulated, instead of a commercial-type negotiation, the process becomes a political one–who has more political clout, employers or unions and provider groups? That is a great way to control health spending.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Mental health company Headway makes, well, headway, by raising an impressive $125 million round of new capital. The company connects patients with mental health providers and facilitates providers working with...
October 11, 2023
Two health care firms owned by private equity firms are merging in a transaction supposedly valued at $3 billion. HealthComp administers self-funded plans for employers and other groups and Virgin...
September 27, 2023
NextGen, an electronic medical records firm, is being put out of its public company misery, as a PE firm will pay $1.6 billion for the one-time high-flier.
September 7, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace