Intensive care unit use is very expensive. End-of-life care can be very expensive. Using ICUs for the very elderly may be questionable. These subjects are explored in a new study from France regarding ICU use for patients over 75. (JAMA Article) The study involved 3036 patients at 24 hospitals which had ICUs. The hospitals were randomized to either continue using their current practices for ICU use or to adopt a systematic triaging for whether patients over 75 got admitted to an ICU. The most common diagnoses for the patients being evaluated were septic shock, acute pneumonia, cardiac insufficiency and acute respiratory failure. While there were more deaths in the 6 months following the hospital admissions in the group using a triage system for ICU use, after adjustment for patient characteristics these differences were not significant. ICU use was actually higher, at 61% of the patients, for the triage system hospitals than for the ones using standard practice, at 34%, and was significant after adjustment. The mortality rate while the patients were in the ICU was not significantly different between the two sets of hospitals, but the in-hospital mortality was higher in the systematic triage hospitals. Independence in activities of daily living and quality of life did not appear to be materially different after 6 months between the group of patients in the hospitals using their standard approach to ICU admissions and those using the systematic triage approach. Interpretation of the results is ambiguous. Taking a more rigorous approach to who gets into an ICU appeared to actually increase ICU use, which raises costs. At the same time, being in an ICU did not appear to either increase quality outcomes or decrease them. So, given that it likely costs something to implement the systematic triage, hospitals almost might be better off doing what they have been doing. And it is not clear that the study answers more fundamental questions about whether ICU care is necessary at all, does it provide any benefits for any patients?
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Government-Run Health Care Is Really Wonderful
January 18, 2025
Government-Run Health Care Is Really Wonderful
Government-run health systems create wait lists, leading to worsening health and outcomes.
Commentary
“Non-Profit” Hospitals Aren’t
January 18, 2025
“Non-Profit” Hospitals Aren’t
Executives of non-profit hospitals are grotesquely overpaid, which is one cause of high health care…
Commentary
Minnesota Is a Great State for Starting a Business, According to Little Timmy
January 16, 2025
Minnesota Is a Great State for Starting a Business, According to Little Timmy
As usual, Fat Timmy lies when he opens his mouth. Minnesota is about the worst…