In the context of ongoing concern about the level of health spending in the US, it is useful to conduct long-term studies to identify potential changes in the nature of the spending. Researchers have created something called the “Ecology of Medical Care” which looks at who is using services, how many services are used and spending on those services, using a constant dollar approach. Using data from the 1996-97 and 2011-2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the authors compared trends in this “ecology”. (AFM Article) The utilization and spending were broken down by a variety of categories, such as inpatient, drugs, dental, vision, etc. There was no difference between the two time periods in the proportion of individuals using a service or the number of services per population unit for total visits, outpatient visits, physician visits, specialty physician visits, ER visits or inpatient hospitalizations. However, expenditures increased for most of these categories, with inpatient being an exception. This would suggest that unit price is the cause of the expenditure increase. The same proportion of people had a primary care visit, but there were fewer visits per unit of population, although spending was the same, again suggesting price growth. The proportion of people using prescription medications was relatively constant, but use per person was up, and spending was up significantly, accounting for over 40% of all spending growth. The total spending increase from the early period to the latter one was 47%, from $246 per individual per month to $362. While there are issues in use of survey data, the MEPS data has been around for a long time and involves relatively large numbers of people and the methodology has been extensively evaluated and adjusted to account for known problems. The results of this study suggest that we are not seeing runaway utilization, but rather they support the idea that unit price growth is responsible for most of the change in our health spending, particularly in regard to prescription drugs. So lets focus on how to reduce unit prices instead of wailing about unnecessary and inappropriate care and waste in the system.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
September 20, 2023
How Not to Fix the Educational Crisis
A report proposing to address serious issues with our educational system instead demonstrates exactly why…
Commentary
September 20, 2023
This Review Will Get Slammed by Scientific American Too
The authors of the mask review Scientific American wrongly impugned have now gone after lockdowns.
Commentary
September 19, 2023
Scientific American Is Not Scientific
A Scientific American editorial reveals nothing about masks but a lot about the ideology-driven nature…