Identifying high-risk patients is a key to many care management and wellness programs. Claims data is often used as a source for this identification, as is biometric information. Research published in the journal Health Services Review suggests use of some additional data that attempts to measure the level of patient engagement health. (HSR Article) This work builds on the “Patient Activation Measure” created by Judith Hibbard and colleagues. This measure supposedly shows that level of engagement is correlated with lower health costs and better quality outcomes. Data used in the study was extracted from the EHR of a large accountable care organization with around 100,000 patients. Patients’ PAM scores were calculated for 2011 and care utilization for 2012-14 was examined, particularly for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, meaning those where good primary care might have avoided ER use or hospitalizations. Persons with low PAM scores were those who said they did not feel competent to navigate the health system on their own or to manage their own health. These patients were 25% more likely than consumers with the highest PAM scores to develop a chronic disease during the study period and also had higher rates of hospitalization, 62% more likely to have one, and emergency room use for ambulatory-care sensitive conditions. This suggests that adding this survey-type data on activation level, or really health and health care management competence, can be a useful factor in stratifying patients by risk of high service utilization. Identifying these patients may also help direct resources toward aiding them with health care decisions and activities. Of course, the PAM level probably is strongly linked to patients’ health status by its nature, since people in poor health tend to have less cognitive and physical energy to deal with health care decisions and to be more despondent about their skills in general.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
September 24, 2023
Relative Spending and Utilization for Medicare Advantage Plans
Medicare Advantage plans have lower utilization and spending than does the Medicare fee-for-service program.
Commentary
September 23, 2023
Stop-loss Insurance Claims for Self-funded Employers
A report on stop-loss insurance reveals increases in number of claims and average cost of…
Commentary
September 22, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 224
From far across the Pacific comes yet another set of summaries, just like the virus.