The big three issues in health care are said to be access, cost and quality. A report from the Centers for Disease Control based on 2014 survey data evaluates some core access measures. (CDC Report) The researchers looked first at the number of adults with a usual place of care. Having a regular clinician helps aid in coordination and continuity of care and ensures that basic preventive care is received. People without a usual place of care often use emergency rooms or urgent care centers when they need services. Nationally, 17.3% of citizens have no usual place of care, but this varies from 2.8% in Vermont to 26.7% in Nevada. The states with the highest rates tend to be in the West and Southwest and those with the lowest in the Northeast or Midwest. To some extent this may reflect long travel times in states with a larger area. Only nine states were actually above the national average, but they tended to have large populations. The second measure was the percentage of adults aged 18 to 64 who did not have a visit with a general care physician in the last 12 months. Nationally that rate is 34% and it varies from 15.9% in Vermont to 48.1% in Montana. The Rocky Mountain states tended to have high rates and the Northeast lower ones, but it is a fairly diverse geographic mix. And this statistic may actually reflect the healthiness of a population as well as access difficulties. The reform law’s Medicaid expansion had a very minor effect on either of these rates. 16.6% of adults did not have a usual place of care in states that did the Medicaid expansion versus 18.2% in non expansion states. Similarly, 33.3% of adults in expansion states saw a doctor in the last year and 35% in non expansion states did. So the very expensive Medicaid expansion doesn’t seem to have done much to move these basic measures of access. The type of reform law insurance exchange also did not appear to have an impact on these measures.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
October 4, 2023
Electric Cars for Everyone, so Rich People Can Get Richer
Everything about electric cars is expensive, including insurance, but rich people get richer from them.
Commentary
October 3, 2023
Minnesota’s Modeling Nightmare
Minnesota finally wants to figure out how epidemic modeling was so bad, but the Strib…
Commentary
October 3, 2023
Reality Intrudes Again on the Renewable Energy Delusion
Solar and wind power are the most expensive forms of electricity and the cost of…