After our post last Friday on the difficulty even experts have in evaluating health apps, this week we find that the Commonwealth Fund sets out a framework for conducting such evaluations. (Commonwealth Brief) The premise behind the value of mobile apps is that they will help engage patients, both in decision-making and in self-management, especially of chronic conditions. The authors in particular suggest that they can “empower high-need, high-cost patients to self-manage.” I find that somewhat hard to swallow, since a large junk of this sub-segment has dementia and/or is institutionalized and/or is too ill to handle these tasks. And it is pretty clear that mobile apps have their greatest audience among younger, healthier people. But I digress. The researchers looked at apps for chronic diseases that were patient-facing. The primary categories set up for the evaluation framework include capability to engage; safety, meaning respect for privacy and security and how the app responded to the entry of “dangerous” information and quality, which related to reliability and usability of information. They created a pyramid of techniques by which to rate engagement. From least to most, these were: educational content, alerts or reminders, recording and tracking data, displaying and summarizing data, providing guidance, enabling communication with providers or family, providing support through social networks and supporting behavior change through rewards. Using this framework, well less than half of all apps were even judged to be possibly useful in engaging the patient. The authors then go into detailed evaluations on three common apps using the framework. Coupled with the other research, this paper suggests that mobile apps have a long way to go to becoming a meaningful tool in achieving better health outcomes.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 31, 2023
Electric Vehicles Suck
Electric cars are more expensive to buy and operate than gas ones, and worse for…
Commentary
March 31, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 202
Such a depressing world and I am not sure these research summaries are particularly elevating.
Commentary
March 31, 2023
And Then There is This…
Some supposed conservatives just spout conspiratorial nonsense that ensures that we lose, which is one…