Medicare and other third-party payers are continuing to develop and test new payment methods that largely involve placing providers at risk. A presentation from an Altarum conference lays out these methods and their status. (Altarum Presentation) All of these methods stem from the notion that fee-for-service reimbursement causes excessive and inappropriate utilization (a thesis which ought to be challenged more aggressively since most other countries with far less per capita spending primarily use fee-for-service reimbursement, they just have significantly lower prices). Some, such as capitation, have been around for decades, but are being rediscovered. As the presentation sets out, these risk-based compensation methods tend to either focus on a specific episode of care or treatment for a specific disease or condition, or they cover all of a person’s health needs for a set period of time. One place where risk-based payments are used is in most accountable care organizations which have shown somewhat rapid growth both in Medicare and commercial populations, although their results are decidedly mixed to date. Medicare’s ACOs have shown small overall savings and while some commercial payers claim savings of 10% or so, these are unverified by more rigorous research. Medicare is gradually moving at least one branch of its ACO design toward a more rational approach which gets closer to patient lock-in and other features which facilitate risk-taking. Medical homes are another initiative which tends to use risk-based compensation, but also has had design issues, at least in Medicare. Medical homes tend to be primary care focused, but there is no reason why the practice or physician could not take overall risk, as they are intended to coordinate and manage all of the patient’s care. Medicare has stated that it hopes to move the majority of its reimbursement to a risk-basis in the next few years. For risk-based measures to work well for providers, they must have accurate and complete access to a patient’s past records and to real-time current information and they must have rigorous patient engagement and care management processes. A good actuarial understanding of risk helps as well. Most provider groups are not very far up the learning curve on these basic capabilities, so a lot of hiccups can be expected.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
November 4 Debt Auction
November 4, 2024
November 4 Debt Auction
Another disappointing US debt auction.
Commentary
The Party of the Rich and Why the Rich Don’t Pay Their Fair Share
November 4, 2024
The Party of the Rich and Why the Rich Don’t Pay Their Fair Share
Democrats are the party of the rich, they are owned by the rich, especially in…
Commentary
Thank God It Will All Be Over Soon
November 2, 2024
Thank God It Will All Be Over Soon
Our political process is driving us all crazy.