Retail health clinics burst on the health care scene over a decade ago, driven by consumer desires for greater convenience and lower cost for relatively minor health needs. Today they are often found in drug stores, grocery stores, discount retail chains like Walmart and Target. They increasingly overlap with another rapidly growing health service location–urgent care centers. While the retail clinics started out with a limited menu of health issues-sore throats, etc., now they are exploring treatment of chronic diseases and other revenue sources. A Robert Wood Johnson Foundation report attempts to describe the current state of the industry. (RWJF Report) In 2014 there were 10.5 million visits to 1800 retail clinics. CVS alone owns 900 of these sites, with Walgreens having another 437. Major reasons for patients choosing a retail clinic setting for care include 59% who say the hours were more convenient, 56% who said they didn’t have to make an appointment, 48% saying the location was more convenient and 39% who said the cost was lower. Uninsured respondents were more than twice as like as insured ones to say that cost was a factor. Although the clinics are lower cost than alternative care settings, they are more heavily used by middle-income patients than poor ones, which likely reflects their locations, typically in suburban or more affluent urban neighborhoods. Because treatment costs are substantially lower at the retail clinics, and prices are often posted and easily understandable by patients, commercial insurers have often not only included them in their networks, but offer incentives for their use, such as reduced or waived copays. There have been concerns about disjointed care, but many of the clinics are integrated into larger primary care and health system settings. The clinics have generally scored well on quality measures and patients report high levels of satisfaction with the care and service they get in the clinics. Some suggestions made in the report for expanding and optimizing the role of these clinics include better integration of data and services with other care settings, expanding the ability to conduct telemedicine visits from clinics, reducing scope of practice and other regulatory barriers, and improving access in poorer neighborhoods. For owners there is an issue about whether retail clinics can generate a return on capital, but it seems clear that patients appreciate having them available and get lower cost care with equivalent quality.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Minnesota Is a Great State for Starting a Business, According to Little Timmy
January 16, 2025
Minnesota Is a Great State for Starting a Business, According to Little Timmy
As usual, Fat Timmy lies when he opens his mouth. Minnesota is about the worst…
Commentary
Inflation Is Tamed?
January 16, 2025
Inflation Is Tamed?
Yesterday's inflation report was wrongly hailed as a sign of slowing price growth.
Commentary
Bias in Social Sciences Research
January 15, 2025
Bias in Social Sciences Research
New research demonstrates that ideological bias permeates the "results" of social science studies.