CMS’ program to reduce hospital readmissions, a worthy goal, has drawn intense criticism for its design and execution. Now it is rolling out the program to more conditions, including surgeries. Be nice to know why readmissions after surgery occur and how many truly are avoidable or not the fault of the hospital, and maybe you would like to know that before you design the reduction program. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association tries to fill this gap, not that the policy wonks at CMS are paying any attention. (JAMA Article) The researchers used data on readmissions after surgery from 346 hospitals participating in a common quality reporting program. Six surgeries were examined, bariatric procedures, colectomy, hysterectomy, total hip or knee replacement, ventral hernia repair and leg vascular bypass. The primary outcomes were unplanned 30-day readmission rates and the reasons for those readmissions. Overall the rate of readmission across almost a half a million surgeries was 5.7%, ranging from 3.8% for hysterectomy to 14.9% for the leg bypass surgeries. The most common reason for the readmission across all surgeries was surgical site infection at 19.5% of readmissions. This clearly should be viewed as preventable, but the reality is that even with a great deal of focus it has been hard for hospitals to reduce these infections.. Other common reasons varied by surgery type but were mostly unrelated to a problem occurring during the original hospitalization. Only 2.3% of patients were readmitted for a complication that occurred in the initial hospital stay. So hospitals are potentially being penalized for something that happens after the patient leaves the hospital and which may not be very predicable. Many of the reasons for readmission also may not be amenable to easy efforts to reduce their occurrence and the difficulty in this task may discourage hospitals from trying, even if they know they may be penalized. We continue to think that the best way to design these programs is to examine each readmission and make an independent clinical judgment about whether it could have been avoided.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
What do you get when you combine a company with a commodity business model, that out of desperation massively overpays for another company that has a commodity business model? $10...
July 27, 2022
The “stupid” model for health care venture capital investing is alive and well. Everside health, which operates primary care clinics and has grown by acquiring other failing health care businesses,...
July 26, 2022
Apparently not even a cute name can save you if you have a stupid business. I constantly bemoan the mis-application of capital and health care is Exhibit A. Olive, another...
July 26, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace