CMS’ program to reduce hospital readmissions, a worthy goal, has drawn intense criticism for its design and execution. Now it is rolling out the program to more conditions, including surgeries. Be nice to know why readmissions after surgery occur and how many truly are avoidable or not the fault of the hospital, and maybe you would like to know that before you design the reduction program. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association tries to fill this gap, not that the policy wonks at CMS are paying any attention. (JAMA Article) The researchers used data on readmissions after surgery from 346 hospitals participating in a common quality reporting program. Six surgeries were examined, bariatric procedures, colectomy, hysterectomy, total hip or knee replacement, ventral hernia repair and leg vascular bypass. The primary outcomes were unplanned 30-day readmission rates and the reasons for those readmissions. Overall the rate of readmission across almost a half a million surgeries was 5.7%, ranging from 3.8% for hysterectomy to 14.9% for the leg bypass surgeries. The most common reason for the readmission across all surgeries was surgical site infection at 19.5% of readmissions. This clearly should be viewed as preventable, but the reality is that even with a great deal of focus it has been hard for hospitals to reduce these infections.. Other common reasons varied by surgery type but were mostly unrelated to a problem occurring during the original hospitalization. Only 2.3% of patients were readmitted for a complication that occurred in the initial hospital stay. So hospitals are potentially being penalized for something that happens after the patient leaves the hospital and which may not be very predicable. Many of the reasons for readmission also may not be amenable to easy efforts to reduce their occurrence and the difficulty in this task may discourage hospitals from trying, even if they know they may be penalized. We continue to think that the best way to design these programs is to examine each readmission and make an independent clinical judgment about whether it could have been avoided.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Variation in Health Spending
February 16, 2025
Variation in Health Spending
Another interesting analysis of geographic variation in health spending.
Commentary
All Quiet on the Western Front
February 15, 2025
All Quiet on the Western Front
The pre-eminent description of war's impact on those who must fight it was written after…
Commentary
Yesterday’s 30-year US Bond Auction Did Not Go Well
February 14, 2025
Yesterday’s 30-year US Bond Auction Did Not Go Well
Warning signs aplenty if Congress does not get its act together on deficit reduction.