Health care coverage costs are growing for employers and employees, but the private sector is feeling the pain a lot more than is the public one, as verified by a Statistical Brief from the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ Brief). Based on data from 2012, largely from the MEPS survey, the brief gives a good sense of just how much health care coverage costs. In 2012 there were about 130.4 civilian employees, public and private, and 113 million or 87% worked where the employer-provided access to health insurance. Of these, 34 million enrolled in civilian coverage, 12.4 million in single plus one coverage and 21.6 in family coverage. Average public sector premiums were $6278 for single, $11,642 for employee plus one and $16,301 for family coverage; while in the private sector the corresponding amounts were $5,384 for single, $10,621 for employee plus one and $15,473 for family. The higher public cost reflects a typically much richer benefit design, and while the premiums are higher, public employees almost always pay a much lower share of the premium and have lower cost-sharing amounts. For example, while public employees contributed only $713 for single coverage, private ones paid $1,118; and for family coverage, public workers chipped in $3,088 while private employees paid $4,236. Eyeball math would suggest that public employees were contributing about 11% of total single premium and 19% of the family cost while private ones paid almost 21% of the total cost for single coverage and 27% for family. Considering that public employees also get more cash compensation for the same work and have far, far richer retirement benefits, the difference in health costs is disgraceful. There is no excuse at all for allowing public workers to be better compensated in any respect than the average private sector employee, whose taxes are paying for the public employees, doing similar work.
Private Versus Public Employee Health Insurance Costs
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
October 2, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 226
Once more into the research breach, lockdowns, masks, et al.
Commentary
October 1, 2023
More Climate Research that the Hysterics Won’t Like
A few climate notes as the truth-tellers somehow manage to penetrate that attempted censorship of…
Commentary
October 1, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 225
Interesting research continues to appear and I will keep summarizing it for you.