A number of entities provide survey data on the world of employment-based health benefits and the findings are always useful. The 2014 bSwift benefits study, based on 388 benefit decision-maker responses, is no exception. (bSwift Report) The primary trends identified by the report are greater reliance on employee self-service and automation; continued growth in wellness programs and associated incentives; and consideration of defined contribution approaches. For large employers, those with over 500 employees, 87% have a wellness program, while 69% of smaller employers–50 to 500 employees, do so, which is actually a drop from 81% in 2013. Health cost savings, employee engagement and better health outcomes were the top reasons cited for adopting wellness efforts. Surprisingly, participation rates dropped in large employers, with only 40% having greater than 50% of employees engaged. HRAs, coaching, biometric tests, fitness and weight loss activities and smoking cessation are the primary features of large and small employer wellness programs. Although the reform law allows greater incentives for wellness participation, few employers took advantage of those higher limits, with most still offering less than $500 in incentive value. This despite a finding that larger incentives drive greater participation. The use of biometric result-based incentives has increased significantly. Premium reductions are the most common form of incentive, followed by cash and gift cards. A relatively small, but growing, number of employers are considering defined contribution approaches–18% of large employers and 10% of smaller ones. Companies may be unsure that these plans will actually reduce their costs. About 80% of large employers use some form of online enrollment. And about 80% conduct some form of dependent eligibility verification. Small employers are far behind in their use of these cost-saving technologies.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 25, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 201
Tired of March Madness? A boringly refreshing dip into some CV-19 research summaries is recommended.
Commentary
March 24, 2023
The CDC Is a Font of Methodological and Statistical Error
Several times in the last three years I and others have pointed out serious flaws…
Commentary
March 24, 2023
A Couple of Health Care Notes
A couple of pieces of health care research focus on high health care spending and…