With reform in full swing, everyone wants to know what is up with employer-based health insurance. Of course, that mandate was delayed and other reform provisions have been eviscerated by the Administration, as the rolling disaster known as the PPACA unfolds, but there are impacts. An Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Statistical Brief details private sector group coverage in 2012, based on survey data. (Stat. Brief) The Brief divides employer-based coverage into three types: single, single plus one and family. Companies are roughly divided into small, under 50 employees, and large, over 50 employees. About 55.4 million employees were enrolled in employer insurance coverage in 2012. About 51% had single coverage, 18% had employee plus one and 31% enrolled in family coverage. The primary difference between large and small employers was that employees in small firms had a higher percent of employees in single-only coverage, likely a result of higher premium sharing for single plus one and family coverage in those firms. Average premium costs were $5384 for single coverage, $10,621 for employee plus one and $15,473 for family coverage. The only significant difference in premium between large and small firms was that family coverage cost 7% less in small firms, a somewhat surprising result. Almost all employees must share some part of the premium, although 17% with single coverage did not have to do so, compared with about 8% for the other coverage types. Again, it is surprising to see that in small firms, employees were less likely to have to pay part of the premium. This was true for 45% of employees in small firms with single coverage, compared to 10% in large firms. And for the other coverage types, the comparable percents with no premium were around 30% for small companies and 4% in large ones. The average contribution to single coverage was $1118 and it was $4,236 for family coverage; and again employees in small firms tended to pay a lower percent of the premium for single coverage than did those in large firms; but for the other coverage types, employees in large firms paid a slightly lower percent of total premium. Health benefits have a high cost to companies, and a large percent of that burden, especially for families, is borne by the employee.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
December 13, 2024
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
Minnesota has negative after-inflation personal income growth as the Incompetent Blowhard's policies destroy the state's…
Commentary
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
December 13, 2024
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
Its over, Johnny, its over, but there is still time left to have some fun.
Commentary
Quantum Computing
December 12, 2024
Quantum Computing
Quantum computing is pretty fascinating and getting closer to common use.